Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TitansAFC
Why didn’t the north just buy the south’s slaves and free them that way?

The owners needed the slaves to work the plantations, etc. Does Paul expect that Union troops would have replaced the slaves after freeing them.

291 posted on 03/31/2010 5:57:37 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RGSpincich
The owners needed the slaves to work the plantations, etc. Does Paul expect that Union troops would have replaced the slaves after freeing them.

Well, did Union troops replace the slaves after the Civil War? Why would this scenario be any different? Poor white subsistence farmers, freed slaves, and a small number of immigrants would have started working for wages in the South, as happened anyway. That's all.

341 posted on 03/31/2010 6:56:29 PM PDT by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson