Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
England thought we were subjects. We thought we should be independent. Most of our founders disagreed fundamentally with the “Divine right of Kings”.
320 posted on 03/31/2010 6:19:26 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

>England thought we were subjects.

We were.

>We thought we should be independent.

That would be slightly before the Declaration of Independence; the thing that probably galvanized the sentiment FOR independence was when King George III hired _German_ mercenaries to ‘keep the peace.’

>Most of our founders disagreed fundamentally with the “Divine right of Kings”.

I’m not sure which came first, the disagreeing or the abuses; it is likely akin to the Chicken and the Egg... but I tend to think that if the King had acted Justly and Honorably to the Colonists we would be saying “God save the King” & “God save the King” today. Do not underestimate the ‘popular support’ of a ruler who DOES act justly.


329 posted on 03/31/2010 6:36:29 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson