Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB
from the article:
"Because there is no statute, there would be no grounds for a complaint," spokeswoman Eulinda Smith said. "It would be legally deficient."

But Grayson appears undeterred, arguing the Cassell has violated the Hippocratic Oath when he turned away patients on the basis of political beliefs.

So typical of dems, Grayson is undeterred by the fact that his complaint is LEGALLY DEFICIENT; he is determined to harass this doctor who had the audacity to exercise his free speech rights.
172 posted on 04/05/2010 6:58:46 AM PDT by VRWCmember (Give them 2.54 cm and they'll take 1.61 km.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: VRWCmember

They haven’t found anyone that was “turned away because of political beliefs”.

It won’t happen.

Some will turn THEMSELVES away.

I seriously wouldn’t want to give a doctor that supported 0bama any of my income,
so I can imagine some on the other side feeling the same way.


173 posted on 04/05/2010 7:06:23 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson