Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What About Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest? Women and Sexual Assault
Life News ^ | 4/5/10 | Amy Sobie

Posted on 04/05/2010 3:13:26 PM PDT by wagglebee

LifeNews.com Note: Amy Sobie is the editor of The Post-Abortion Review, a quarterly publication of the Elliot Institute. The organization is a widely respected leader in research and analysis of medical, mental health and other complications resulting from abortions.

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. Many people, including those whose mission is to help women and girls who are victims of sexual assault and abuse, believe abortion is the best solution if a pregnancy occurs.

Yet our research shows that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault don't want abortion, and say abortion only compounds their trauma.

“How can you deny an abortion to a twelve-year-old girl who is the victim of incest?”

Typically, people on both sides of the abortion debate accept the premise that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault want abortions. From this “fact,” it naturally follows that the reason women want abortions in these cases is because it will help them to put the assault behind them, recover more quickly, and avoid the additional trauma of giving birth to a “rapist’s child.”

But in fact, the welfare of a mother and her child are never at odds, even in sexual assault cases. As the stories of many women confirm, both the mother and the child are helped by preserving life, not by perpetuating violence.

Sadly, however, the testimonies of women who have actually been pregnant through sexual assault are routinely left out of this public debate. Many people, including sexual assault victims who have never been pregnant, may be forming opinions based on their own prejudices and fears rather than the real life experiences of those people who have been in this difficult situation and reality.

For example, it is commonly assumed that rape victims who become pregnant would naturally want abortions. But in the only major study of pregnant rape victims ever done prior to this book, Dr. Sandra Mahkorn found that 75 to 85 percent did not have abortions. This figure is remarkably similar to the 73 percent birth rate found in our sample of 164 pregnant rape victims. This one finding alone should cause people to pause and reflect on the presumption that abortion is wanted or even best for sexual assault victims.1

Several reasons were given for not aborting. Many women who become pregnant through sexual assault do not believe in abortion, believing it would be a further act of violence perpetrated against their bodies and their children. Further, many believe that their children’s lives may have some intrinsic meaning or purpose which they do not yet understand. This child was brought into their lives by a horrible, repulsive act. But perhaps God, or fate, will use the child for some greater purpose. Good can come from evil.

The woman may also sense, at least at a subconscious level, that if she can get through the pregnancy she will have conquered the rape. By giving birth, she can reclaim some of her lost self-esteem. Giving birth, especially when conception was not desired, is a totally selfless act, a generous act, a display of courage, strength, and honor. It is proof that she is better than the rapist. While he was selfish, she can be generous. While he destroyed, she can nurture.

Adding to the Trauma

Many people assume that abortion will at least help a rape victim put the assault behind her and get on with her life. But evidence shows that abortion is not some magical surgery which turns back the clock to make a woman “un-pregnant.”

Instead, it is a real life event which is always very stressful and often traumatic. Once we accept that abortion is itself an event with deep ramifications for a woman’s life, then we must look carefully at the special circumstances of the pregnant sexual assault victim. Evidence indicates that abortion doesn't help and only causes further injury to an already bruised psyche?

But before we even get to this issue, we must ask: do most women who become pregnant as a result of sexual assault want to abort?

In our survey of women who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest, many women who underwent abortions indicated that they felt pressured or were strongly directed by family members or health care workers to have abortions. The abortion came about not because of the woman's desire to abort but as a response to the suggestions or demands of others. In many cases, resources such as health workers, counselors and others who are normally there to help women after sexual assault pushed for abortion.

Family pressure, withholding of support and resources that the woman needed to continue the pregnancy, manipulative an inadequate counseling and other problems all played a role into pushing women into abortions, even though abortion was often not what the woman really wanted.

Further, in almost every case involving incest, it was the girl's parents or the perpetrator who made the decision and arrangements for the abortion, not the girl herself. None of these women reported having any input into the decision. Each was simply expected to comply with the choice of others. In several cases, the abortion was carried out over the objections of the girl, who clearly told others that wanted to continue the pregnancy. In a few cases, victim was not even clearly aware that she was pregnant or that the abortion was being carried out.

"Medical Rape"

Second, although many people believe that abortion will help a woman resolve the trauma of rape more quickly, or at least keep her from being reminded of the rape throughout her pregnancy, many of the women in our survey who had abortions reported that abortion only added to and accentuated the traumatic feelings associated with sexual assault.

This is easy to understand when one considers that many women have described their abortions as being similar to a rape (and even used the term "medical rape), it is easy to see that abortion is likely to add a second trauma to the earlier trauma of sexual assault. Abortion involves an often painful intrusion into a woman’s sexual organs by a masked stranger who is invading her body. Once she is on the operating table, she loses control over her body. Even if she protests and asks the abortionist to stop, chances are she will be either ignored or told that it's too late to stop the abortion.

For many women this experiential association between abortion and sexual assault is very strong. It is especially strong for women who have a prior history of sexual assault, whether or not the aborted child was conceived during an act of assault. This is just one reason why women with a history of sexual assault are likely to experience greater distress during and after an abortion than are other women.

Research also shows that women who abort and women who are raped often describe similar feelings of depression, guilt, lowered self-esteem, violation and resentment of men. Rather than easing the psychological burdens experienced by those who have been raped, abortion added to them. Jackie wrote:

I soon discovered that the aftermath of my abortion continued a long time after the memory of my rape had faded. I felt empty and horrible. Nobody told me about the pain I would feel deep within causing nightmares and deep depressions. They had all told me that after the abortion I could continue my life as if nothing had happened.2

Those encouraging, pushing or insisting on abortion often do so because they are uncomfortable dealing with sexual assault victims, or perhaps because they harbor some prejudice against victims whom they feel “let it happen.” Wiping out the pregnancy is a way of hiding the problem. It is a “quick and easy” way to avoid dealing with the woman’s true emotional, social and financial needs. As Kathleen wrote:

I, having lived through rape, and also having raised a child “conceived in rape,” feel personally assaulted and insulted every time I hear that abortion should be legal because of rape and incest. I feel that we're being used by pro-abortionists to further the abortion issue, even though we've not been asked to tell our side of the story.

Trapping the Incest Victim

The case against abortion for incest pregnancies is even stronger. Studies show that incest victims rarely ever voluntarily agree to abortion. Instead of viewing the pregnancy as unwanted, the incest victim is more likely to see the pregnancy as a way out of the incestuous relationship because the birth of her child will expose the sexual activity. She is also likely to see in her pregnancy the hope of bearing a child with whom she can establish a truly loving relationship, one far different than the exploitive relationship in which she has been trapped.

But while the girl may see her pregnancy as a possible way of release from her situation, it poses a threat to her abuser. It is also poses a threat to the pathological secrecy which may envelop other members of the family who are afraid to acknowledge the abuse. Because of this dual threat, the victim may be coerced or forced into an unwanted abortion by both the abuser and other family members.

For example, Edith, a 12-year-old victim of incest impregnated by her stepfather, writes twenty-five years after the abortion of her child:

Throughout the years I have been depressed, suicidal, furious, outraged, lonely, and have felt a sense of loss . . . The abortion which was to “be in my best interest” just has not been. As far as I can tell, it only ‘saved their reputations,’ ‘solved their problems,’ and ‘allowed their lives to go merrily on.’ . . . My daughter, how I miss her so. I miss her regardless of the reason for her conception."

Abortion businesses who routinely ignore this evidence and neglect to interview minors presented for abortion for signs of coercion or incest are actually contributing to the victimization of young girls. Not only are they robbing the victim of her child, they are concealing a crime, abetting a perpetrator, and handing the victim back to her abuser so that the exploitation can continue.

For example, the parents of three teenaged Baltimore girls pleaded guilty to three counts of first-degree rape and child sexual abuse. The father had repeatedly raped the three girls over a period of at least nine years, and the rapes were covered up by at least ten abortions. At least five of the abortions were performed by the same abortionist at the same clinic.3

Sadly, there is strong evidence that failing to ask questions about the pregnancy and to report cases of sexual abuse are widespread at abortion clinics. Undercover investigations by pro-life groups have found numerous cases in which clinics agreed to cover up cases of statutory rape or ongoing abuse of minor girls by older men and simply perform an abortion instead.

In 2002 a judge found a Planned Parenthood affiliate in Arizona negligent for failing to report a case in which a 13-year-old girl was impregnated and taken for an abortion by her 23-year-old foster brother. The abortion business did not notify authorities until the girl returned six months later for a second abortion. A lawsuit alleged that the girl was subjected to repeated abuse and a second abortion because Planned Parenthood failed to notify authorities when she had her first abortion. The girl's foster brother was later imprisoned for abusing her.4

Finally, we must recognize that children conceived through sexual assault also deserve to have their voices heard. Rebecca Wasser-Kiessling, who was conceived in a rape, is rightfully proud of her mother’s courage and generosity and wisely reminds us of a fundamental truth that transcends biological paternity: “I believe that God rewarded my birth mother for the suffering she endured, and that I am a gift to her. The serial rapist is not my creator; God is.”

Similarly, Julie Makimaa, who works diligently against the perception that abortion is acceptable or even necessary in cases of sexual assault, proclaims, “It doesn't matter how I began. What matters is who I will become.”

That’s a slogan we can all live with.


Citations

1. Mahkorn, "Pregnancy and Sexual Assault," The Psychological Aspects of Abortion, eds. Mall & Watts, (Washington, D.C., University Publications of America, 1979) 55-69.

2. David C. Reardon, Aborted Women, Silent No More (Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press, 1987), 206.

3. Jean Marbella, "Satisfactory explanations of sex crime proved elusive," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31, 1990; M. Dion Thompson, "GBMC, doctor suspected nothing amiss," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31. 1990; "Family Horror Comes to Light in Story of Girls Raped by Father," Baltimore Sun, November 4, 1990; Raymond L. Sanchez, "Mother Sentenced in Rape Case," Baltimore Sun, Dec. 6, 1990.

4. "Planned Parenthood Found Negligent in Reporting Molested Teen's Abortion," Pro-Life Infonet, attributed to Associated Press; Dec. 26, 2002.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 521-524 next last
To: wagglebee
There are no words in ancient Hebrew for vagina,

I have almost no knowledge of ancient Hebrew but I would find it beyond belief that they had no way of referring to that part of the female anatomy.

361 posted on 04/07/2010 12:44:31 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; xzins; P-Marlowe
I think the case can also be made that because Christ was fully human that ANY human characteristics He had would also be shared by us.

Disagree. Although he partook of the flesh, he did not partake in the flesh nature.

His blood was uncontaminated. He was the only true innocent blood ever born.

The seed was divine (not Joseph's) and since blood of the baby does not mix with the blood of the mother, the Christ baby was born with sinless blood, not the blood of our fallen ancestors.

362 posted on 04/07/2010 12:52:26 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; xzins; P-Marlowe

Are you saying that Jesus Christ WAS NOT fully man and fully God?


363 posted on 04/07/2010 1:15:38 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; P-Marlowe; xzins
I have almost no knowledge of ancient Hebrew but I would find it beyond belief that they had no way of referring to that part of the female anatomy.

They did have a way, they called it the WOMB.

364 posted on 04/07/2010 1:16:40 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

If we allow abortion for rape, we should allow it for everyone.

I’m not against abortion to punish a woman for having sex; I’m against abortion because it is murder.

I cannot condone abortion in the circumstance of rape and then be against it for everyone else. I’m not trying to punish the woman, I am trying to protect the baby. There is no difference either way, unless you are really trying to punish a woman for having sex.


365 posted on 04/07/2010 1:23:56 PM PDT by TNLawyer ("Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

Why not capital punishment for the woman who decides to have an abortion?


366 posted on 04/07/2010 1:26:35 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TNLawyer

I agree. I just don’t know if there is any chance of ever getting that through.


367 posted on 04/07/2010 1:28:02 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; wagglebee

“Life” means growth. Something that is not alive, does not grow. For instance - corpses, skeletons, shed skin, cut hair, furniture, rocks, etc.

As soon as the embryo divides the first time, it is alive, because it is growing. To me (maybe I’m a simpleton) it’s simple.

Growth = the presence of life.

Every adult or aged body is still growing - cells dividing, etc.

I am 100% pro-life regarding the slaughter of the unborn, which is the topic of this thread.

Here is a short story:

A girl, 19 years old or thereabouts (she was taking a lot of drugs and some alcohol at the time, so didn’t notice things like birthdays and January 1, etc) had sex with one young man she barely knew. Drugs and/or alcohol were involved. At that time, another young man she barely knew hopped on and performed sex with her - she was not ready for this, but didn’t fight or anything but I can tell you she wasn’t happy.

Rest of the story in a bit. BTW, this happened in late 1968 or early 1969.


368 posted on 04/07/2010 1:28:31 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Alamo-Girl; spunkets; Quix; kosta50; metmom; P-Marlowe; xzins; Eagle Eye
That's an understatement! The culture of death's new push is to be allowed to systematically kill those who are most certainly alive.

I have no doubt about that, dear wagglebee!

It seems to me the culture of death has long realized that, before man can be attacked directly, God must first be removed. (E.g., killed; the death of God movement, etc.)

With God "gone," man is defenseless against the onslaught of his would-be destroyers — which in our current cultural circumstances would seem to be ideological elites who falsely propose themselves as "saviors" of mankind, who propose themselves as the harbingers and soon-to-be deliverers of a perfect world to come, if we would just do what they tell us, the "hoi polloi," to do. Those who don't do as they are told are deeply suspect.

These world-beaters use the same old tired arguments and methods that have always failed in human history. But they don't let that discourage them. All they care about is "rhetorical plausibility" in the face of what they consider to be "dimwits," for so long as it takes to secure "unchallengeable" power for themselves and their cohorts. They know that, once securely in power, they can quell "dissent" in many, many highly effective ways....

If history is any guide; that is, if past tells us anything about future, many of those who are presently "most certainly alive" perish under such regimes.

Which takes elite contempt for the sanctity of Life — and "ordinary" human beings in general — to the next level of sheer evil, presaging horrors to come....

We live in interesting times, dear brother in Christ! Thank you so very much for your outstanding essay/post!

369 posted on 04/07/2010 1:53:53 PM PDT by betty boop (The personal is not the public's business. See: the Ninth Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’m agreeing with what the Bible says. My opinion isn’t worth a whole lot.


370 posted on 04/07/2010 4:24:39 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

God is the father of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ was a man who lived perfectly according to God’s will, died, was raised from the dead, and ascended to sit at God’s right hand.

If you have a problem with that then take it up with God.


371 posted on 04/07/2010 4:27:10 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; P-Marlowe; xzins

You have still not answered my question, so I will ask it again. Are you saying that Jesus Christ WAS NOT fully man and fully God?

Alternatively, are you a Mormon or Jehovah’s Witness? I’m not asking to be confrontational, but it would explain your statements.


372 posted on 04/07/2010 4:35:05 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Life” means growth

In that case stalagmites are alive.

373 posted on 04/07/2010 4:45:28 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

The way inanimate objects “grow” is completely different from the way living bodies grow. Stalagtites are just piled on, they don’t have growth happening from within via cellular growth and metabolism. Heck, a pile of dirt “grows” when you toss shovelfuls of dirt on it!


374 posted on 04/07/2010 5:08:00 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Neither.

Put it this way, the Bible says there is but one God, and the man Christ Jesus is the mediator between men and God.

God is the father of Jesus Christ.

Jesus is the Son of God.

God is invisible

Jesus was seen.

God is not a man that he should lie nor the son of man that he should repent.

Jesus is a man and is repeatedly referred to as the son of man.

God has no beginning or end.

Jesus had genesis (the word used for birth) and died on the cross.

God cannot be tempted with evil.

Jesus was tempted in all ways.

You can say what you want but when you agree with the Bible you are right and when you disagree with it you are wrong.


375 posted on 04/07/2010 5:11:58 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
One minor addition to your list of characteristics:
Jesus Christ claims to be God.
376 posted on 04/07/2010 5:16:26 PM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; wagglebee

Finishing my story.

So the girl in question became pregnant. Terrible situation. Listening to ill advice, and being ignorant and without any moral values or good people to help her, she got an abortion in a state which allowed abortions for “mental health” reasons.

She knew nothing whatsoever about how babies grow in the womb, stages of development, and no one counseled her against the abortion. She was lost, unhappy, sinful, and continued the life of immorality for another year or two until her life changed.

Some years later she met a woman around her age, who, coincidentally, had become pregnant (no marriage either) but had given birth and given the baby up for adoption. The girl who had had the abortion wished with all her heart that she had done the same thing.

Many years later, this woman who had aborted her first child (she subsequently had two children) felt, and still feels, pain and remorse - sheds tears of sorrow, that she killed a human being, and would have had three children walking the earth, instead of two.

I am telling this story because the conception, while not involving violent forcible rape, was not much different in the sense that there was no love, no commitment, not even (on part of it) any real voluntary action. Drugs and alcohol are often involved in rape. The child conceived was about as far from “wanted” or planned as any could be. But the violence of the abortion did not make this girl’s life easier, did not “solve” a problem; but on the contrary, made her life much, much worse.

I wish she had had sidewalk counseling, the story might have had a different ending. But it wasn’t around in those days.


377 posted on 04/07/2010 5:17:23 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; P-Marlowe; xzins

Okay, you’re a non-Trinitarian, that explains your posts. Since this thread doesn’t actually have anything to do with Trinitarian beliefs, I will drop the subject.


378 posted on 04/07/2010 5:19:36 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

That’s why I went the route I did.


379 posted on 04/07/2010 5:21:55 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Finishing my story.

Very sad story. But it has NOTHING to do with my posts. Undoubtedly this young woman waited until there was a detectable heartbeat before she decided to abort her pregnancy. So it is totally irrelevant to the points I have been making about the question of whether there is life before there is blood.

So considering that my points on this thread have been limited to the question of whether life begins at conception or at the first heartbeat, what does this story have to do with anything I have said so far?

380 posted on 04/07/2010 5:55:24 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 521-524 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson