To: nickcarraway
>>”Richard Dawson is just another fundamentalist religious fanatic.”
You forgot to add a </sarcasm> tag, so we would know you were not intending to make a statement of actual FACT.
OTOH, if you are actually serious, would you write out YOUR definition of “Fundamentalist?” If not, we must assume that you are using the word merely as a pejorative propaganda device.
DG
46 posted on
04/11/2010 1:16:13 AM PDT by
DoorGunner
("Rom 11: until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; 26 and so, all Israel will be saved")
To: DoorGunner
I wasn't being sarcastic at all. How about this definition:
A usually religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those principles, and often by intolerance of other viewsSounds like Dawkins, right?
To: DoorGunner; nickcarraway
Actually, nickcarraway is right.
Dawkins is just another fundamentalist religious fanatic. He has his belief system and fits the profile perfectly.
200 posted on
04/11/2010 10:48:13 AM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson