Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

>>”Richard Dawson is just another fundamentalist religious fanatic.”

You forgot to add a </sarcasm> tag, so we would know you were not intending to make a statement of actual FACT.

OTOH, if you are actually serious, would you write out YOUR definition of “Fundamentalist?” If not, we must assume that you are using the word merely as a pejorative propaganda device.

DG


46 posted on 04/11/2010 1:16:13 AM PDT by DoorGunner ("Rom 11: until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; 26 and so, all Israel will be saved")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: DoorGunner
I wasn't being sarcastic at all. How about this definition: A usually religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those principles, and often by intolerance of other views

Sounds like Dawkins, right?

68 posted on 04/11/2010 2:23:53 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: DoorGunner; nickcarraway

Actually, nickcarraway is right.

Dawkins is just another fundamentalist religious fanatic. He has his belief system and fits the profile perfectly.


200 posted on 04/11/2010 10:48:13 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson