Thanks. Another good view, but not as long as the above link.
One might assume the Left is getting desperate. BWHAHAHA!
People say "good security". I say "mediocre to poor security" or at least nominal security, but in no way was it "good security" there in Sacramento.
A) We KNEW they were going to try something like this at one or more Tea Party events around the nation.
B) The man had exactly nine seconds (00:09) from his "Give me my freedom" when he stormed the stage, to when he was finally tackled and subdued.
C) This man had violent intent, but was unarmed (at least this time in this situation).
D) Had this man been armed with two automatic pistols, in that 9 seconds from the stage he could have cause multiple injuries and death.
E) The fact of the matter is, our numbers are going to grow and so with it is the enemy's frustration. They just will not be able to stand seeing Socialism coming unravelled and such large crowds growing everywhere. I do think it is only a matter of time that they give up their efforts to slander us, and turn--albeit it maybe isolated circumstances, to actual armed violence, and it could be when somebody famous is speaking on those Tea Party stages.
In conclusion, I think there should be a series of trained, muscular, serious and alert professional, large bouncers around bottom of that dais and podium, three feet apart from other, with a security ring around that thing. Nobody but nobody should be allowed up on a stage like that in such a state, and for that long of a time. Immense damage could have been done, and this again I think is a potent wake up call and not just something of a humorous nature, deranged moonbats as they are.