Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gibbs: W.H. press posing for cameras [“I don't think many people have to watch Fox to understand...]
Politico ^

Posted on 04/18/2010 8:58:46 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Sub-Driver; abb; weegee; Liz
“I sometimes joke that I know when somebody thinks they have a good question, because when I walk in they've already got their makeup on.”

Converely, those who refuse to pose a hard question to you can remain butt-ugly.

21 posted on 04/18/2010 9:22:37 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: y6162
“Please let Gibbs stay right where he is “

Agree. . .and 'Amen'.

Do wish Fox News had 'bumper stickers'/ whereby we could show 'support'. (Do have a 'Fox Nation' one...but prefer a 'real message'.)

They WARNED you - NOW DARE TO GO! - FOX NEWS.COM /lol

No question - it is the 'best address' for News. . .

Take that Gibbs - you lose!

22 posted on 04/18/2010 9:24:11 AM PDT by cricket (We cannot allow the 'man who would be king' to be one!/No demon-no demonization. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

“Converely, those who refuse to pose a hard question to you can remain butt-ugly.”

You may have cause and effect reversed here. Isn’t it at least possible that Helen Thomas’s appearance is a little cosmic joke played by God on those who shamelessly promote the Devil’s agenda by refusing to pose hard questions?


23 posted on 04/18/2010 9:31:12 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Let's try an imaginary slant on this issue:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

GibbsPerino: W.H. press posing for cameras

Press secretary Robert Gibbs Dana Perino chided the White House press corps Sunday, saying that some of its members are more interested in camera time than reporting.

“I wonder at times what it would be like” at his her daily briefings “if we turned the cameras off, and we could just have a discussion,” Gibbs Perino said on CNN’s FOX's “Reliable Sources,”"FOX News Sunday," likening the events to a “cable TV show.”

“I sometimes joke that I know when somebody thinks they have a good question, because when I walk in they've already got their makeup on.”

Responding to repeated questions from host Howard Kurtz Chris Wallace about why Obama Bush has held no press conferences since July 2009, Gibbs Perino seemed to dismiss their relevance, calling it “an arbitrary Washington measure” of the president’s accessibility. “This president has taken questions through countless interviews through – answering questions directly from the media,” Gibbs Perino said.

While more broadly expressing frustration with press coverage, Gibbs Perino singled out Fox MSNBC, saying that while the administration understands the need to “play the game” by giving the network access, it has a definitive “slant” in its coverage, including its news programs, and that it caters to a viewership that’s already made up its mind.

“I don't think many people have to watch Fox MSNBC to understand the—the political slant that they have,” Gibbs Perino said. “They're feeding an audience that they know want to see and hear a certain side of that argument.”


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

(waits for liberal heads to stop exploding noisily across the land if this had truly occurred during the previous administration)

Yeah. That's what I thought.
24 posted on 04/18/2010 9:34:35 AM PDT by pillut48 ("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

This photo has to be doctored. No way can you see Obama’s reflection in a mirror...


25 posted on 04/18/2010 9:36:59 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No press conference since July 2009? That should be a headline in itself.

What has he got to hide? Why is he afraid of even a sympathetic press? They all love him, so he knows he wouldn’t get any hostile questions (unlike the “essay questions” Bush used to get...questions prefaced by a verbal essay stating the reporter’s anti-Bush personal opinions on whatever the “question” was about).

Bambi performs very badly in public, particularly in situations that are unscripted or are supposed to appear so. IIRC, at the last press conference he had, all the questions had to be submitted in advance and pre-approved. But even that didn’t succeed in preventing him from giving stammering, stumbling, mispronounced and completely off-topic “answers.” And even his friends in the press were forced to make them public.

Gibbs and the gang have obviously decided it’s safer to keep him out of such situations as much as possible. Heck, they didn’t even allow the press at this latest “nuclear summit,” which is certainly a first - and yet the press isn’t even complaining. Strange, no?


26 posted on 04/18/2010 9:39:44 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
HolyO and Gibbs' liberal definition of "transparency":

Function: transitive verb
1 : to prevent disclosure of or fail to disclose (as a provision in a contract) esp. in violation of a duty to disclose
2 to place out of sight
3 to keep from being seen, found, observed, or discovered; hide.
4 to hide; withdraw or remove from observation; cover or keep from sight


It's not THEIR fault we have different dictionaries than the WH!!!

/sarc
27 posted on 04/18/2010 9:41:55 AM PDT by pillut48 ("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This poser had a kiss and make-up session(Press airs grievances to Gibbs [rarely have I sensed such a level of anger...... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2495089/posts] with the press the other day after the Poser in Chief seriously breeched protocol by ditching the press for a D.C. outing. Now that the lap dog press has quietly lain back down under the table, he can say what he really thinks of them again.


28 posted on 04/18/2010 9:41:56 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

LOL!! Post of the day! LOLOL!! :-)


29 posted on 04/18/2010 9:43:06 AM PDT by pillut48 ("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Ayup! He’s one of our best weapons against this administrations.


30 posted on 04/18/2010 9:45:02 AM PDT by rejoicing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sax
If Gibbs had any balls whatsoever, he could man it up, and speak some truth.

Well, that's not what he's getting paid to do. He get's paid to say something to make the President look good, no matter what the circumstance, and to keep the President from having to answer any questions.

And he's not real good at that, either.

31 posted on 04/18/2010 9:49:34 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sax
Gibbs/Obama/dems in general do have balls unlike repubs, which is the problem. They use this advantage to push their agenda down our throats.

If a fiscal republican’s, if there are anymore, press secretary called out CNNNBAABAAPCBS ect... for promoting big government, more entitlement spending, would you have a problem with that?

We need a Machiavellian “Prince” running the country, not deficit whores who spend to garner votes or a get along by any means necessary, spineless politician posed as a “conservative” republican who is afraid to take on the press/members of the opposite side of the aisle.

If nothing at all, Gibbs should be commended for fearlessly taking on democrats ideological enemies without impunity. My hope is that some leader for limited government would be as fearless as the Obama machine, instead of “compromisers”.

32 posted on 04/18/2010 9:54:43 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
"The most intelligent, thoughtful press secretary in history"

LMAO!!!
33 posted on 04/18/2010 10:17:06 AM PDT by Sudetenland (Slow to anger but terrible in vengence...such is the character of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“I don’t think many people have to watch Fox to understand the—the political slant that they have,” Gibbs said. “They’re feeding an audience that they know want to see and hear a certain side of that argument.”

The Obama Administration: the pettiest, most vindictive, and most childish “administration” in history.


34 posted on 04/18/2010 10:17:26 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
This loser couldn’t sell road apples to flies.

Or watermelons on the side of the road even if he had the Highway Patrol to flag down cars.

35 posted on 04/18/2010 10:19:51 AM PDT by VRWCtaz (America has Zero to be ashamed of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Russ
This photo has to be doctored. No way can you see Obama’s reflection in a mirror...


36 posted on 04/18/2010 10:24:15 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hmmmm ..?? Of course those who watch FOX do so with an already made up mind - this admin is the worst ever.

Is this why NBC, ABC, CBS, the NYT and the WP - HAVE ALL LOST VIEWERSHIP since FOX came on the scene. Guess the public got smart a lot sooner than Gibbs.


37 posted on 04/18/2010 10:34:36 AM PDT by CyberAnt (HEALTHCARE IS NOT A "RIGHT"!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I don't think many people have to watch Fox to understand the—the political slant that they have,” Gibbs said. “They're feeding an audience that they know want to see and hear a certain side of that argument.”

Yes, and based on their ratings, that would be most of America.

38 posted on 04/18/2010 10:36:02 AM PDT by McGavin999 (Have you donated to Free Republic yet? If not you are a Freeploader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Even the Obama loving WH press corpse is getting fed up with Gibbs.


39 posted on 04/18/2010 10:53:23 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Doesn’t FOX have that Libtard. Jerry Rivers?

Oh, yes. . .while there are others, of course; 'Jerry' is Fox News' unequivical proof of balance.

40 posted on 04/18/2010 11:17:07 AM PDT by cricket (We cannot allow the 'man who would be king' to be one!/No demon-no demonization. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson