Skip to comments.
Gibbs: W.H. press posing for cameras [“I don't think many people have to watch Fox to understand...]
Politico ^
Posted on 04/18/2010 8:58:46 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Sub-Driver; abb; weegee; Liz
I sometimes joke that I know when somebody thinks they have a good question, because when I walk in they've already got their makeup on. Converely, those who refuse to pose a hard question to you can remain butt-ugly.
To: y6162
Please let Gibbs stay right where he is Agree. . .and 'Amen'.
Do wish Fox News had 'bumper stickers'/ whereby we could show 'support'. (Do have a 'Fox Nation' one...but prefer a 'real message'.)
They WARNED you - NOW DARE TO GO! - FOX NEWS.COM /lol
No question - it is the 'best address' for News. . .
Take that Gibbs - you lose!
22
posted on
04/18/2010 9:24:11 AM PDT
by
cricket
(We cannot allow the 'man who would be king' to be one!/No demon-no demonization. . .)
To: martin_fierro
“Converely, those who refuse to pose a hard question to you can remain butt-ugly.”
You may have cause and effect reversed here. Isn’t it at least possible that Helen Thomas’s appearance is a little cosmic joke played by God on those who shamelessly promote the Devil’s agenda by refusing to pose hard questions?
23
posted on
04/18/2010 9:31:12 AM PDT
by
DrC
To: Sub-Driver
Let's try an imaginary slant on this issue:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
GibbsPerino: W.H. press posing for cameras
Press secretary Robert Gibbs Dana Perino chided the White House press corps Sunday, saying that some of its members are more interested in camera time than reporting.
I wonder at times what it would be like at his her daily briefings if we turned the cameras off, and we could just have a discussion, Gibbs Perino said on CNNs FOX's Reliable Sources,"FOX News Sunday," likening the events to a cable TV show.
I sometimes joke that I know when somebody thinks they have a good question, because when I walk in they've already got their makeup on.
Responding to repeated questions from host Howard Kurtz Chris Wallace about why Obama Bush has held no press conferences since July 2009, Gibbs Perino seemed to dismiss their relevance, calling it an arbitrary Washington measure of the presidents accessibility. This president has taken questions through countless interviews through answering questions directly from the media, Gibbs Perino said.
While more broadly expressing frustration with press coverage, Gibbs Perino singled out Fox MSNBC, saying that while the administration understands the need to play the game by giving the network access, it has a definitive slant in its coverage, including its news programs, and that it caters to a viewership thats already made up its mind.
I don't think many people have to watch Fox MSNBC to understand thethe political slant that they have, Gibbs Perino said. They're feeding an audience that they know want to see and hear a certain side of that argument.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(waits for liberal heads to stop exploding noisily across the land if this had truly occurred during the previous administration)
Yeah. That's what I thought.
24
posted on
04/18/2010 9:34:35 AM PDT
by
pillut48
("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
To: bahblahbah
This photo has to be doctored. No way can you see Obama’s reflection in a mirror...
25
posted on
04/18/2010 9:36:59 AM PDT
by
Russ
(Repeal the 17th amendment)
To: Sub-Driver
No press conference since July 2009? That should be a headline in itself.
What has he got to hide? Why is he afraid of even a sympathetic press? They all love him, so he knows he wouldn’t get any hostile questions (unlike the “essay questions” Bush used to get...questions prefaced by a verbal essay stating the reporter’s anti-Bush personal opinions on whatever the “question” was about).
Bambi performs very badly in public, particularly in situations that are unscripted or are supposed to appear so. IIRC, at the last press conference he had, all the questions had to be submitted in advance and pre-approved. But even that didn’t succeed in preventing him from giving stammering, stumbling, mispronounced and completely off-topic “answers.” And even his friends in the press were forced to make them public.
Gibbs and the gang have obviously decided it’s safer to keep him out of such situations as much as possible. Heck, they didn’t even allow the press at this latest “nuclear summit,” which is certainly a first - and yet the press isn’t even complaining. Strange, no?
26
posted on
04/18/2010 9:39:44 AM PDT
by
livius
To: Thane_Banquo
HolyO and Gibbs' liberal definition of "transparency":
Function: transitive verb
1 : to prevent disclosure of or fail to disclose (as a provision in a contract) esp. in violation of a duty to disclose
2 to place out of sight
3 to keep from being seen, found, observed, or discovered; hide.
4 to hide; withdraw or remove from observation; cover or keep from sight
It's not THEIR fault we have different dictionaries than the WH!!!
/sarc
27
posted on
04/18/2010 9:41:55 AM PDT
by
pillut48
("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
To: Sub-Driver
This poser had a kiss and make-up session(Press airs grievances to Gibbs [rarely have I sensed such a level of anger...... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2495089/posts] with the press the other day after the Poser in Chief seriously breeched protocol by ditching the press for a D.C. outing. Now that the lap dog press has quietly lain back down under the table, he can say what he really thinks of them again.
28
posted on
04/18/2010 9:41:56 AM PDT
by
gusopol3
To: martin_fierro
LOL!! Post of the day! LOLOL!! :-)
29
posted on
04/18/2010 9:43:06 AM PDT
by
pillut48
("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
To: Flightdeck
Ayup! He’s one of our best weapons against this administrations.
To: Sax
If Gibbs had any balls whatsoever, he could man it up, and speak some truth.Well, that's not what he's getting paid to do. He get's paid to say something to make the President look good, no matter what the circumstance, and to keep the President from having to answer any questions.
And he's not real good at that, either.
31
posted on
04/18/2010 9:49:34 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(The Last Boy Scout)
To: Sax
Gibbs/Obama/dems in general do have balls unlike repubs, which is the problem. They use this advantage to push their agenda down our throats.
If a fiscal republican’s, if there are anymore, press secretary called out CNNNBAABAAPCBS ect... for promoting big government, more entitlement spending, would you have a problem with that?
We need a Machiavellian “Prince” running the country, not deficit whores who spend to garner votes or a get along by any means necessary, spineless politician posed as a “conservative” republican who is afraid to take on the press/members of the opposite side of the aisle.
If nothing at all, Gibbs should be commended for fearlessly taking on democrats ideological enemies without impunity. My hope is that some leader for limited government would be as fearless as the Obama machine, instead of “compromisers”.
32
posted on
04/18/2010 9:54:43 AM PDT
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: Flightdeck
"The most intelligent, thoughtful press secretary in history"
LMAO!!!
33
posted on
04/18/2010 10:17:06 AM PDT
by
Sudetenland
(Slow to anger but terrible in vengence...such is the character of the American people.)
To: Sub-Driver
I don’t think many people have to watch Fox to understand thethe political slant that they have, Gibbs said. They’re feeding an audience that they know want to see and hear a certain side of that argument.
The Obama Administration: the pettiest, most vindictive, and most childish “administration” in history.
34
posted on
04/18/2010 10:17:26 AM PDT
by
DennisR
(Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
To: Psycho_Bunny
This loser couldnt sell road apples to flies. Or watermelons on the side of the road even if he had the Highway Patrol to flag down cars.
35
posted on
04/18/2010 10:19:51 AM PDT
by
VRWCtaz
(America has Zero to be ashamed of.)
To: Russ
This photo has to be doctored. No way can you see Obamas reflection in a mirror...
36
posted on
04/18/2010 10:24:15 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Sub-Driver
Hmmmm ..?? Of course those who watch FOX do so with an already made up mind - this admin is the worst ever.
Is this why NBC, ABC, CBS, the NYT and the WP - HAVE ALL LOST VIEWERSHIP since FOX came on the scene. Guess the public got smart a lot sooner than Gibbs.
37
posted on
04/18/2010 10:34:36 AM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(HEALTHCARE IS NOT A "RIGHT"!!)
To: Sub-Driver
I don't think many people have to watch Fox to understand thethe political slant that they have, Gibbs said. They're feeding an audience that they know want to see and hear a certain side of that argument.Yes, and based on their ratings, that would be most of America.
38
posted on
04/18/2010 10:36:02 AM PDT
by
McGavin999
(Have you donated to Free Republic yet? If not you are a Freeploader)
To: Sub-Driver
Even the Obama loving WH press corpse is getting fed up with Gibbs.
To: Paladin2
Doesnt FOX have that Libtard. Jerry Rivers? Oh, yes. . .while there are others, of course; 'Jerry' is Fox News' unequivical proof of balance.
40
posted on
04/18/2010 11:17:07 AM PDT
by
cricket
(We cannot allow the 'man who would be king' to be one!/No demon-no demonization. . .)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson