Replies

If Gibbs had any balls whatsoever, he could man it up, and speak some truth. There are more MSM outlets that have a left leaning bias than there are with a right leaning bias. The left leaning biased organizations benefit the current administration and the right leaning biased organizations hamper the administration. So, they'll pretend the left leaning bias does not exist and represents a neutral/unbiased position, and will attempt to devalue and vilify the right leaning bias. It's condensentively insulting and is a clear example that the administration is not comfortable dealing in the truth and operating in the sunshine.

If Gibbs had any balls whatsoever, he could man it up, and speak some truth.

Well, that's not what he's getting paid to do. He get's paid to say something to make the President look good, no matter what the circumstance, and to keep the President from having to answer any questions.

And he's not real good at that, either.

Gibbs/Obama/dems in general do have balls unlike repubs, which is the problem. They use this advantage to push their agenda down our throats.

If a fiscal republican’s, if there are anymore, press secretary called out CNNNBAABAAPCBS ect... for promoting big government, more entitlement spending, would you have a problem with that?

We need a Machiavellian “Prince” running the country, not deficit whores who spend to garner votes or a get along by any means necessary, spineless politician posed as a “conservative” republican who is afraid to take on the press/members of the opposite side of the aisle.

If nothing at all, Gibbs should be commended for fearlessly taking on democrats ideological enemies without impunity. My hope is that some leader for limited government would be as fearless as the Obama machine, instead of “compromisers”.