Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conimbricenses

Rand Paul is the one endorsing the looney-toon longshot 9/11 truther, not the other way around.

If Guiliani supporting Greyson bothers you so much, what do you have to say about the Stormfront neo-Nazis doing money bombs for Rand Paul? You okay with that?


12 posted on 04/19/2010 1:15:04 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
The stormfronters are a bunch of fruitcakes to be sure, but they also don't have any real political clout and I doubt they've even raised more than a couple hundred dollars collectively between them...if that.

So again, I'm much more concerned about Grayson being endorsed and supported by this guy:

(Note: I'm referring to the guy on the left, Rudy Giuliani, though the one on the right, Mnsgr. Alan Placa, is equally disturbing. He's a close Rudy confidant and pedophile priest who molested several little boys at a Catholic school on Long Island)

19 posted on 04/19/2010 1:24:46 PM PDT by conimbricenses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard; RaceBannon; Jim Robinson

First I am NOT defending any neo-Nazi scumbags, nor am I trying to defend this Kokesh guy, or the Campaign for Liberty because even though I’ve heard of the CFL I have not ever heard of the guy and am not familiar with what is going on...

The thing that bothers me is how people are making assumptions about the candidates themselves in relation to non-official postings on a racist website. For instance, if someone posted something about Bush on that site, and suggested voting for him would people automatically think that Bush himself authorized it, and is directly involved?

How do we know it isn’t someone AGAINST the candidate putting such things on that website in order to make a stronger case? The other thing is that many things are posted on sites like that without the knowledge of those who produced the work (kind of like articles are posted here). Just because a member of the Stormfront group posts something on their website does that automatically mean that the person who wrote the article or whatnot is responsible for it being there, and does it imply that they then endorse Stormfront? I don’t think so...

As I said, I’m not familiar with the specifics you all are talking about, but it concerns me that people may be making assumptions based upon an anonymous posting at that website.

[I’m out the door to the grocery store, but will be back a bit later and I will be checking out the “whole story”. If I’ve misunderstood what’s going on, please be kind! :) ]


35 posted on 04/19/2010 2:36:41 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson