Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is a transparent attempt by the Progressives in Congress to dilute the vote of American citizens and establish a perpetual Democrat majority in Congress. If Porto Rico becomes a state, the Democrats can immediately seat 2 new Senators and 6 Congresspersons under what is known as the Tennessee rule. Rather then being rushed thur under the radar, this issue should be fully debated in front of the American people before it is enacted.
1 posted on 04/28/2010 6:55:24 AM PDT by MNJohnnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/2010/04/27/oppose-statehood-for-puerto-rico-hr-2499/

HR 2499 – Statehood for Puerto Rico
The Obama administration is pulling out all the stops to ensure there are more votes for their side in 2010 and 2012. They are pushing for voting rights for the District of Columbia and now this…

There is a move afoot to have Puerto Rico become the 51st state, with voting on the bill, HR 2499, taking place as early as this week in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Three times in the past 43 years Puerto Ricans have voted against becoming the 51st state in the Union, the last time being 11 years ago. They enjoy their commonwealth status which allows them to enjoy the protection and freedoms and even financial benefits of the United States without paying federal income taxes.

HR 2499 would actually force a yes-or-no vote by Puerto Ricans on whether Puerto Rico should maintain the “current political status” of the island. This sounds innocent enough until the second part of the legislation comes into play; a second vote would have to be administered, this one giving Puerto Ricans no option but statehood or full independence if the majority expresses dissatisfaction with the current political status. Even if there is no dissatisfaction and the “current political status” is favored, every eight years henceforth from the passage of HR 2499 Puerto Rico is forced to conduct another plebiscite on the matter at their own expense.

There are several problems that must first be exposed and debated before such a move should be made. The first is that of creating a bilingual country with the addition of an almost completely Spanish-speaking state. Then there is the problem of reassigning some seats in the U.S. House of Representatives by handing at least six or seven over to Puerto Rico, depriving six or seven existing states of one representative each because of the congressionally-mandated 435 seat cap. This type of political maneuvering seems very partisan because the seats in the Senate and the House would likely be Democratic ones, and the electoral votes awarded Puerto Rico might outnumber those of 22 current states.

Before American taxpayers have to absorb and bailout another financially failing institution — this time the island of Puerto Rico — both Americans and Puerto Ricans need to know and understand that this could just be a case of politicians using this very opaque legislation as a means to whatever ends they envision for not only Puerto Rico and the United States, but also for the political dynamics this situation might bring with it in the future.

Contact your congressmen and send a message that you are unwilling to have them support such a bill until all the political, economic, and cultural details are out on the table, for both Americans and Puerto Ricans. Remind them to oppose HR 2499 on the grounds that it is a very bad move in the present economic and financial climate, with the possible political consequences precluding Americans from being in favor of statehood for the island nation of Puerto Rico at this time.


2 posted on 04/28/2010 6:56:06 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (he problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Who in the hell wants to change the flag?


3 posted on 04/28/2010 6:56:34 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (Pander to me for a change!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
From the Washington Times...

The single worst part of H.R. 2499, dubbed the Puerto Rico Democracy Act, is that it would allow former Puerto Ricans to vote in a pro-statehood advisory referendum even if those former residents are already registered voters in a U.S. state. Instead of voting "early and often," this might be called the "vote here, there and everywhere" stratagem. It is fundamentally undemocratic at its core.

EDITORIAL: Puerto Rico deserves better

7 posted on 04/28/2010 7:05:48 AM PDT by SuperSonic ("The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

More transparency from zero....


8 posted on 04/28/2010 7:08:34 AM PDT by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

The lefties want PR to become a state, so they can then complain about US Imperialism and and fight for independence.

It will give them something to fill their time instead of just watching daytime TV.


9 posted on 04/28/2010 7:10:06 AM PDT by PGR88 (I'm so open-minded, my brains fell out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Besides a star, the liberals will probably want a stripe for them too. Keep ‘em as they are, or let ‘em go free.


10 posted on 04/28/2010 7:12:16 AM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

We can simply nullify the state of PR by creating the state of Eastern California.


13 posted on 04/28/2010 7:22:00 AM PDT by TypeZoNegative (Pro life & Vegan because I respect all life, Republican because our enemies don't respect ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
...it would allow former Puerto Ricans to vote in a pro-statehood advisory referendum even if those former residents are already registered voters in a U.S. state.

Sounds unconstitutional to me.But then,although I don't live there I'd love to vote in NH.

15 posted on 04/28/2010 7:32:10 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Don’t think for a moment that the horsetrading over this will not include DC as a state because there is no question the Congressional Black Caucus will tell the Congressional Hispanic Caucus that the price for their support is DC statehood.


16 posted on 04/28/2010 7:32:23 AM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Is there any way to get this pinned over on ‘Breaking News’ or ‘Front Page’?


18 posted on 04/28/2010 7:37:46 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (I don't have a 'Cousin Pookie'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Fascinating. Yep, must be stopped.


23 posted on 04/28/2010 9:24:49 AM PDT by FourPeas (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson