[tlb]

>>> Ark or an old dwelling - there is 99.9% chance that the video and photos are not staged props so let the investigation happen and we can decide for ourselves.

Signs of old structures are found frequently. Leaping to the conclusion that just because a structure is old, that it must be the literal Ark however tends to invite skepticism and ridicule. I have yet to see anything that would even hint at anything nautical, much less Biblical.

Perhaps if they had followed your good advice and “let the investigation happen” BEFORE issuing their conclusions “with 99% certainty’, they might be considered less as fools or charlatans.

[FootBall]

Mount Ararat was most notably Volcanically active around 3000 b.c. and a few times since. You will notice the lava flow covering the wooden beams in some places and actually ending the beams as it appears the lava burnt through them in attached picture (left center). Hard to plant something like this. Either this is Noah's Ark or an old man-made structure (ref. 1840 volcanic activity, really an earthquake where structures were cover)....It appears this structure is at least as old as the covering lava flow. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Ararat (ref. wiki)