That’s nice, but what matters is what the Supreme Court says.
Of course it’s constitutional. It basically mirrors the federal code on this issue. Illegal aliens have limited rights compared to citizens. Their #1 right is to be deported soon after being discovered. We are denying these illegals their #1 right — a swift and efficient deportation back to country of origin.
From California. Why am I not surprised?
Not if Fat Pig Kagan gets in.
Hell, our esteemed AG, who hasn't actually read the bill, characterizes it as an evil nazi edict.
How do you deal with people who simply will not acknowledge the truth?
That's a bad thing? It might irritate the legal Latinos enough so that they'll stop aiding and abetting the illegals. Maybe they'll think twice about taking their kids' birth certificates across the border to bring back cousin Jose's brood.
A friend said he received a letter from his “bishop” who stating that the only lawsuit that will stand up in court is the one filed by Holder and his boys complaining that Arizona is trying to do the job the Feds are refusing to do. That could be a two edged sword if you ask me. If the Feds admit that stopping the “reconquistadors” is THEIR job, wouldn’t that leave them open to lawsuits by all 57 states complaining that the Feds are refusing to do the job they’re being paid to do?
I’m sure these fellows also thought Bush was selected not elected.
Isn’t it up to the SCOTUS to determine if the AZ immigration law is constitutional or not? It seems that everybody and his mother have suddenly become constitutional lawyers.
Arizona passes a law that mirrors US federal law and the illegals bitch about it.
Now Arizona should now say, “Yes, fine, we’ve learned our lesson. We will instead pass the “Arizona will Treat Illegals Exactly Like Mexico Law” and watch the illegals sh1t their pants. What will they have to bitch about? Pass the exact language Mexico uses to deal with illegals in their country.
If they complain, point out the utter hypocrisy and double standards they are operating under. Because for those south of Mexico, to them, Mexico is like America is to the mexican illegals.
We really need to do this to utterly discredit the left and tie them up into a massive hypocritical (and untenable) pretzel. How can you complain? Arizona is following the exact laws Mexico has? How can you complain when it’s your own laws they are following? What kind of hypocrites are you? In your country you beat the crap out of illegals, your citizens can detain them until the police come and rough them up, take their money and stuff, pack them on hot buses and drive them several hundred miles back into their own countries and warn them the next time will be worse.
Can the professors cite the specific language in the bill which might permit the law to be improperly enforced?
So can every single law that exists. As ... we ... well ... know!
Their statement is as meaningful as saying drownings are possible in swimming pools.
Having been in Arizona and seen the folks wandering about the place I really wonder how you could have “racial profiling” ~ like they all look alike!
UCSD does not have a law school. So I think that these people teach class about law to undergrads at UCSD. If they couldn’t be hired as professors at an actual law school, what does that say about their academic credentials?
However, the professors said the law could create problems, such as racial profiling, if it is not implemented properly.
Good Lord, what law can't create problems if not properly implemented? Every law is capable of being abused, if the police fabricate evidence and the prosecutors go along with it!
But the really big laughs go to the folks who claim the law is "unconstitutional." On what basis? Because the law against illegal entry is a federal law? Would it be unconstitutional for a state trooper to arrest a man for kidnapping?
Washington needs to be reminded that the law is the property of the people, not the government. If only the specific organ of government that passed a law were allowed to enforce it, we would be exposed to the very worst sort of selective enforcement.
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Maybe they’ll clue AG Holder in.
Did the UCSD ever restore the student media funds and their free speech rights?
That's interesting, since UCSD doesn't have a law school.