Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gulf oil spill leak now pegged at 95,000 barrels a day
Lexington Herald Leader ^ | May 19th, 2010 | Renee Schoof - McClatchy Newspapers

Posted on 05/19/2010 5:03:27 PM PDT by FootBall

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2010 5:03:27 PM PDT by FootBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FootBall

There is a lot of oil down there. If they can just get this thing under control, there is a lot of oil down there.


2 posted on 05/19/2010 5:07:35 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FootBall
This has to be the most media friendly, talking-head friendly "environmental disaster" in memory. I mean, it's got it's own website, fugawdsakes.

Maybe it's just me, but I don't hear any shrill ranting from the left on this, no panic, no mass insanity of the sort that announces global warming, or global cooling, or whatever the crisis dujour is.

This is Obama's "Katrina," and Obama is in his White House, and all is well with the world.

3 posted on 05/19/2010 5:09:00 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (the five of the five is the two of the one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Am i missing something? I thought they inserted a tube and was collecting most of it?


4 posted on 05/19/2010 5:09:28 PM PDT by mrsixpack36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FootBall
I still can't see how this could have happened. Unless the left’s accusation that “Big Oil” is “Evil” is true.
5 posted on 05/19/2010 5:09:44 PM PDT by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Such a waste!!!

Some enterprising yacht owners should start *CRUDE CRUISES*
where we all go out with buckets and bring back some barrels of crude - sorta like gold bullion.

I’m in;)


6 posted on 05/19/2010 5:10:33 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair - Man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FootBall

I thought someone suggested that there is a lot of gas and not so much actual oil. It would make the flowseem to be greater than it is.

I don’t know but that is a huge amount of oil in any case.


7 posted on 05/19/2010 5:10:51 PM PDT by Adder (Proudly ignoring Zero since 1-20-09! WTFU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FootBall

I thought we were supposed to have run out of oil by now?

The oil is under pressure and exiting at a very high velocity, through a narrow orifice. There is no way to discern how much of the flow is gas and how much of it is oil. I think anyone who testifies that he knows the flow rate is ‘mis-speaking’.


8 posted on 05/19/2010 5:11:34 PM PDT by lacrew (Barack Obama is always the least experienced most condescending guy in the room. (Rush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsixpack36

They claim to be collecting around 2,000 barrels per day. A small percentage if it is around 100k per day.

Below is a video showing how simple mathematics were used to calculate 97,000 barrels per day.

Why can’t BP calculate flow rate?....Maybe a lie is better than the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_HVH82A6wI


9 posted on 05/19/2010 5:12:42 PM PDT by FootBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

They’ve even suspended the laws of physics for this one.

They’ll resurrect Carl Sagan to explain it to us.


10 posted on 05/19/2010 5:19:54 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FootBall
IMHO, Hyperbole. Doom and gloom from the media.


11 posted on 05/19/2010 5:22:41 PM PDT by BushCountry ( I spoken many wise words in jest, but no comparsion to the number of stupid words spoken in earnest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

You rock!


12 posted on 05/19/2010 5:24:37 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

If the entire 21” tube were flowing full of oil, in order to get 2 million gallons a day, the oil would have to flow around 2 mph.

Only half the tube (by diameter, not area) flowing oil, 7 mph.

Only a quarter the tube flowing oil, 28 mph.

I looked at the video and tried to guess on the speed. Very, very difficult. The gas is flying out of there (my chemistry is sketchy, but I think it is expanding and becoming increasingly lighter than water, and boyancy is a factor). The oil itself is crawling out at a much lower speed.

I swear I read somewhere that BP expected the well to produce 60,000 barrels a day, with a full intact riser...so any number higher than that is sketchy.


13 posted on 05/19/2010 5:25:31 PM PDT by lacrew (Barack Obama is always the least experienced most condescending guy in the room. (Rush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

This is something bigger than Katrina if they don’t get this stopped. The heavy oil has hit the marshes now.

I think had the oil hit the coast immediately they would have been ranting and raving but because it’s taken a month to make landfall so to speak the sheeple have moved on for the most part.

http://www.wwltv.com/video?id=94332629&sec=554827

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/photogalleries/100519-gulf-heavy-oil-marsh-bp-shore-washing-up-pictures/#gulf-oil-reaching-marshes-wide_20690_600x450.jpg


14 posted on 05/19/2010 5:26:12 PM PDT by CajunConservative (Shut Up Mary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

“I swear I read somewhere that BP expected the well to produce 60,000 barrels a day, with a full intact riser...so any number higher than that is sketchy.”

Maybe they could produce 60K per day. (controlling the well)

Seems to me it would not be safe to run the well full open without having some man induced limiting control over the flow.

Maybe another 30K barrels leaks due to manmade limit controls being damaged or not online anymore.


15 posted on 05/19/2010 5:32:25 PM PDT by FootBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

“I swear I read somewhere that BP expected the well to produce 60,000 barrels a day, with a full intact riser...so any number higher than that is sketchy.”

Maybe they could produce 60K per day. (controlling the well)

Seems to me it would not be safe to run the well full open without having some man induced limiting control over the flow.

Maybe another 30K barrels leaks due to manmade limit controls being damaged or not online anymore.


16 posted on 05/19/2010 5:33:31 PM PDT by FootBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FootBall

They actually have no idea. Liberals hate oil companies - except foreign ones and never take the time to learn about it or what really happens.

When the media speaks, stop listening. It is like the AZ law they spoke against for two weeks now, never even having the common sense or respect to read the simple 10 pages.

But they voted on a 2,700 page medical bill.

Throw the bums OUT.


17 posted on 05/19/2010 5:35:57 PM PDT by edcoil (RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FootBall

I always thought a leak was a leak. Now it seems the leak has grown from 5000 to 10000 and now 95000 barrels a day.

Is the ocean floor erupting? Where is all the missing oil?


18 posted on 05/19/2010 5:38:32 PM PDT by BillT (If you can not stand behind our military, you might as well stand in front of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FootBall

with that rate world will blast through peak oil any minute now

any minute


19 posted on 05/19/2010 5:39:13 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FootBall

Ok, the flow yellow ball in the video is moving at 2.87 feet per second, just about 2 miles per hour.

Filling a barrel in 0.89 econds equals 6.3 cubic feet per second, and this will happen at a flow velocity of 2.87 fps when flowing through an area of 2.17 square feet, or a 20” diameter pipe...

So, this calculation assumes the pipe is flowing full.

I’m not defending BP, but whoever made this video is being just as dishonest himself. It looks like at least half the flow is gas (and the velocity he derived seems to be from the gas as well)


20 posted on 05/19/2010 5:39:45 PM PDT by lacrew (Barack Obama is always the least experienced most condescending guy in the room. (Rush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson