Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek
” suspect most of us would have opposed the civil eights act if we had seen where it would lead. The constitution and free market work just fine if they’re allowed to.”

I suspect that you are incorrect. I'm all about individual rights and property rights, etc. However, in this instance, the subject is larger than a debate such as allowing or not allowing smoking in one’s restaurant. Refusing blacks the right to sit at a lunch counter because it's private property had to be addressed. What I am wondering is how is it that when conservatives catch a tail wind and have an opportunity to make some gains they instinctively blow their feet clean off. To put it more simply, why did Rand Paul feel the necessity to be stupid?

22 posted on 05/21/2010 4:49:56 AM PDT by snoringbear (Government is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: snoringbear

You really believe there would be whites only resturants all across America if nanny hadn’t put a stop to it?


24 posted on 05/21/2010 5:00:37 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: snoringbear

In 1960 Richard Nixon got about one third of the Black vote. In 1964 Goldwater got less than ten percent. Why? Goldwater came out against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. You don’t have to support affirmative action to affirm the rights of an average American to be treated decently. Goldwater was not a racist and later recanted his stand on the Civil Rights Act. But the damage had been done.


70 posted on 05/21/2010 8:51:38 AM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson