Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: plain talk
It usually matched your home state because the SS office in your state is more likely to have processed it. see link at post 43

You are assuming BO got his SSN Before '72. He was 11 in '72. Back then you didn't get one until you started having an income. They were not required for dependents until the mid '80s.

But nice try.

189 posted on 05/23/2010 10:53:34 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

at that SSN site it says

” Note: One should not make too much of the “geographical code.” It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.”

Having a CT assigned SSN by itself means nothing. We don’t know when he applied for a SSN. And if it was after 1972 he or a family member could have requested it while in CT. I find this odd and worth investigating by someone but by itself not conclusive evidence of a crime.


221 posted on 05/24/2010 4:31:23 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson