[SvenMagnussen]

"If the CiC is deemed to be occupying the office of POTUS unconstitutionally then one could reasonably believe that *all* orders issued by the military are illegal/invalid."

The de facto officer doctrine applies to those who accept the Usurper as their CiC. Consequently, all orders expressed or axiomatically derived from the CiC are valid and legal for those who do not object to an ineligible officer giving those orders.

The difference for Lakin is that he objected, expressed doubt the CiC was eligible and sought confirmation. This is difficult because there is no formal procedure for notifying the CiC you object and demand confirmation of eligibility. Long story ... short, the de facto officer doctrine does not apply to Lakin because he complained the CiC was ineligible when he was sworn in. The de facto officer doctrine applies to all other military personnel who did not object to the credentials of the CiC.

[jamese777]

“The de facto officer doctrine applies to those who accept the Usurper as their CiC. Consequently, all orders expressed or axiomatically derived from the CiC are valid and legal for those who do not object to an ineligible officer giving those orders.

The difference for Lakin is that he objected, expressed doubt the CiC was eligible and sought confirmation. This is difficult because there is no formal procedure for notifying the CiC you object and demand confirmation of eligibility. Long story ... short, the de facto officer doctrine does not apply to Lakin because he complained the CiC was ineligible when he was sworn in. The de facto officer doctrine applies to all other military personnel who did not object to the credentials of the CiC.”

---

The Investigating Officer for the Lakin case Lieutenant Colonel Driscoll disagreed with your position in his Investigation Memorandum and used the De Facto Officer doctrine as a basis for ruling that no Obama information or testimony is relevant to the charges.

[Uncle Chip]

The de facto officer doctrine applies to those who accept the Usurper as their CiC. Consequently, all orders expressed or axiomatically derived from the CiC are valid and legal for those who do not object to an ineligible officer giving those orders.

The difference for Lakin is that he objected, expressed doubt the CiC was eligible and sought confirmation. This is difficult because there is no formal procedure for notifying the CiC you object and demand confirmation of eligibility. Long story ... short, the de facto officer doctrine does not apply to Lakin because he complained the CiC was ineligible when he was sworn in. The de facto officer doctrine applies to all other military personnel who did not object to the credentials of the CiC.

Hmmmm