Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vic Rawl files formal protest over Alvin Greene's Democratic primary win in South Carolina
New York Daily News ^ | 6/14/2010 | Michael Sheridan

Posted on 06/14/2010 11:27:02 AM PDT by wastedpotential

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: rod1

it IS the sore/loserman party after all.....they are what they are.


41 posted on 06/14/2010 1:09:23 PM PDT by tioga (Remember in November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Noamie

I don’t know about SC specifically, but I believe that most States allow for a ‘fee in lieu of petition’. You can submit petitions to file for free (showing that you have a minimum base of support), or you can pay the fee. In either case, you have, to quote our illustrious pResident, “Skin in the game.” That puts up a minimum bar to keep from having 1,000 names on the primary ballot.

If you are running for U.S. Senate, and you can’t afford $10,400, then you aren’t series about running for Senate.

I paid $3,125 to run for Congress in TX (lost the primary). I could have provided a petition of 500 Republican primary voters instead. Sounds easy. Except. If you have 10 seconds to spend with a potential voter, you don’t want to waste that time talking about the legalize of signing a petition.

Besides, nobody goes through your cash to see which dollars they can get disqualified.

Really. I spent tens of thousands of dollars (much of it my own money) and a year of my life running for Congress. $3,125 is NOT why I didn’t win and wasn’t a serious bar to entry considering all the other costs - money, time, and otherwise - to run.


42 posted on 06/14/2010 1:26:37 PM PDT by ziravan ("Are you better off now than you were 4 trillion dollars ago?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential
It is highly unlikely that the GOP possesses the skills necessary to mastermind this kind of election victory. I think the good people of South Carolina know a good joke when they see it. South Carolina...the Minnesota of the South...
43 posted on 06/14/2010 2:27:18 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ziravan
you aren’t series

Heh, heh, heh...

44 posted on 06/14/2010 2:28:01 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ziravan

I wonder who is funding the challenge to Greene’s win by Rawls?


45 posted on 06/14/2010 3:10:08 PM PDT by DanGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

That loser Rawls in SC and the rat party can whine all they like.

Greene followed their rules and fronted the 10k entry fee thereby proving that he WAS series about running.

Everything else is popcorn fodder.

The REAL deal is that he supposedly didn’t file with the FEC. That’s HUGH! I ended up 27k in debt (to myself) and had an offer this weekend for a contribution to help. I declined. At this point, I’d rather stay 27k in debt than have to amend my now closed FEC committee paperwork.


46 posted on 06/14/2010 3:47:16 PM PDT by ziravan ("Are you better off now than you were 4 trillion dollars ago?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ziravan
He doesn't have to file anything with the FCC if he doesn't have any campaign donations, etc. Someone already wrote on this and he has broken no laws or protocols.
47 posted on 06/14/2010 3:50:12 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

That’s not correct. He had to file. The rules state if you raise OR spend more than 5k, you must file. 10.4k filing fee by itself breaches the requirement to file.

http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/candidate_registration_brochure.pdf


48 posted on 06/14/2010 7:13:46 PM PDT by ziravan ("Are you better off now than you were 4 trillion dollars ago?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ziravan

I’m feeling like I need to be rooting for Greene. I love it when someone sticks a finger in the establishment!


49 posted on 06/14/2010 8:00:39 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential

Vic Rawl lost overwhelmingly, yet cannot respect the will of the voters. It’s no wonder that no one voted for him. He and Olberman are nothing more than rascist bigots.


50 posted on 06/14/2010 8:07:42 PM PDT by purplelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Hey ViKKK, the black dude beat you by a hundred thousand votes.

Actually only about 30000. Greene's total vote was around 100000.

51 posted on 06/14/2010 8:09:38 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential

Nothing new here, each time the Democrats lose, they run crying to the courts. By the time they get through recounting, Greene won’t have vote one and Rawl will have them all.

Republicans that notice, this is only a rehershal for the mid term election if they are held in November.


52 posted on 06/14/2010 8:14:10 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

I don’t think Rawl thinks his whiteness should have given him the win. It seems he’s protesting because this Green guy pretty much filed the $10k entry fee, sat in his parent’s basement for a few months, did nothing to campaign, and won by what, 60-40% ?

I mean it’s fun to watch Dems wrestle each other in the mud like this, but you gotta admit that there’s something really, really weird going down here.


53 posted on 06/14/2010 8:17:08 PM PDT by mquinn (Obama's supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Noamie
$10,400 for the opportunity to run for public office.

Isn’t that like a Poll Tax of sorts?

"A poll tax is a discriminatory tax that is a pre-condition of the exercise of the ability to vote." - Wikipedia

I don't know about the legal issues surrounding this, but it seems to me that if there was not some sort of fee to run for public office, many people might register on a whim, resulting in large extra costs to the state for printing ballots and voter pamphlets.

I noticed in an earlier article that Greene paid the fee at the Democrat Party office, so perhaps they got some of it.

54 posted on 06/14/2010 8:18:51 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

The primaries are run by the parties. That’s why the fees are paid to the parties. The fees serve 2 purposes:

1. Pay for cost of placement on ballot.

2. Minor barrier to entry that eliminates frivolous entries without being exclusive of serious candidates.


55 posted on 06/14/2010 10:18:46 PM PDT by ziravan ("Are you better off now than you were 4 trillion dollars ago?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential

I, for one, think its shameful that Rawl and his fellow democrats are being so racist and refusing to believe that a relatively inexperienced black man could legitimately win an election against an old white career politician.


56 posted on 06/15/2010 10:44:26 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson