Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hispanic apparent winner in unusual NY election
AP via Breitbart ^ | June 16, 2010 | By JIM FITZGERALD

Posted on 06/15/2010 10:29:36 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

An unusual court-ordered election in a New York City suburb apparently has put a Hispanic on the village's Board of Trustees for the first time. A spokesman for the village of Port Chester said early Wednesday that 43-year-old Luis Marino was among the top six finishers in final but unofficial balloting for six trustee positions.

Although the village of about 30,000 residents is nearly half Hispanic, no Latino had ever been elected trustee. Most voters were white, and white candidates always won.

Federal Judge Stephen Robinson said that violated the Voting Rights Act. He imposed an election system in which residents were allowed to cast six votes each and could give all six to one candidate.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/15/2010 10:29:36 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

This photo provided by the Port Chester, N.Y., village clerk shows the ballot for the election of six village trustees, which ends Tuesday, June 15, 2010. In an effort to correct a 2006 finding by the federal government that the existing election system was unfair, this election allows voting over a five day period and gives residents six votes each to apportion as they wish among the candidates.

2 posted on 06/15/2010 10:31:08 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
"Federal Judge Stephen Robinson said that violated the Voting Rights Act. He imposed an election system in which residents were allowed to cast six votes each and could give all six to one candidate."

What?

Again, one of the numerous stories reported by the media that fails to give a link to the judge's ruling. So, you have to take their word about what it says, rather than reading it for yourself.

3 posted on 06/15/2010 10:33:07 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Votar repetido y viguorosamente! seis votos pro persona! seis por uno! 6x1= seis votos! si!!


4 posted on 06/15/2010 10:41:33 PM PDT by Ancient Drive (DRINK COFFEE! - Do Stupid Things Faster with More Energy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

This is Zoë Baird come back to life. She was full of this stuff.


5 posted on 06/15/2010 10:50:05 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

FR link

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2534954/posts


6 posted on 06/15/2010 10:55:15 PM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (1.416785(71) x 10^32 You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happinesswithoutpeace

Thanks for linking it!


7 posted on 06/15/2010 11:00:01 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

: )


8 posted on 06/15/2010 11:06:18 PM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (1.416785(71) x 10^32 You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Federal Judge Stephen Robinson said that violated the Voting Rights Act. He imposed an election system in which residents were allowed to cast six votes each and could give all six to one candidate.

It is to their great shame that the entire town of Port Chester didn't RIOT on that day, and a mob carry "Judge" Robinson out of his chambers to tar and feather him. Just disgusting beyond imagination.

9 posted on 06/15/2010 11:13:20 PM PDT by montag813 (http://www.StandWithArizona.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I can not beleive they did not raise hell about him over turning democracy. I guess many Americans are ready to be communist.


10 posted on 06/15/2010 11:21:01 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
"Although the village of about 30,000 residents is nearly half Hispanic, no Latino had ever been elected trustee. Most voters were white, and white candidates always won."

Most voters were White? Does that mean that a high percentage of latinos were not legally able to vote because they were not citizens? Were only latino voters given 6 votes?

11 posted on 06/16/2010 1:03:58 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Well...

Nothing like a color blind society...

Some are more equal than others...


12 posted on 06/16/2010 1:58:49 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
Were only latino voters given 6 votes?

No. Every voter get 6 votes to distribute as they see fit.

13 posted on 06/16/2010 6:32:14 AM PDT by TankerKC (This is the internet, not a court of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I live five miles from Port Chester. The town is a low-income refuge for various service workers. It Is located between Greenwhich, Connecticut, and Rye, New York, both among the 10 wealthiest towns in the United States. Portchester’s residents work primarily in Rye and Greenwich, but also in nearby Scarsdale, Larchmont, and Bedford.

This type of voting is, of course idiotic. With an almost total majority, if Hispanic voters wanted to get their candidates elected, they should have no problem organizing voters around fewer candidates. But what people are missing here is that EVERYBODY got to vote six times, not just Hispanics. Therefore, it was not a civil rights issue, and therefore not suceptible to federal election laws. As long as nobody is discriminated against, municipalities are free to organize their elections however they choose.


14 posted on 06/16/2010 2:19:20 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson