Posted on 06/18/2010 4:58:51 AM PDT by Kaslin
I had no trouble understanding him. It’s called “ceding the point.” He doesn’t want his main argument to get sidetracked by an objection on this matter. He’s leaving that argument for another day.
Just for the record, Bush didn't "ban" embryonic stem cell research, as so many critics claimed, and he didn't restrict non-embryonic stem cell research at all. He merely ruled that scientists shouldn't create any new embryonic stem cell lines, because creating life to destroy it is unethical and immoral. This view, according to Obama (and Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, The New York Times, et al.), was unscientific.said the most idealogical candidates ever produced by the most idealogy-driven party in the history of the United States. [unpaid ad begins] Help make the Democratic Party part of history this fall.
Thanks.
Federal funding of non-defense research is unconstitutional, with or without W’s restrictions.
Goobers in “Da Gooberment” have been editing scientist’s work, misquoting, “editing, ad nauseam ever since “Agenda Uber Alles” became acceptable to the electorate.
When the electorate demands that any agency doing such “scientific lying” have that division shut down and the offending Goobers jailed, then and ONLY THEN will such behavior stop.
As any educator can tell you, there must be consequences for asocial behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.