That’s because to you evolution is the end all be all of science. It’s really just a small part of the scientific body of knowledge. And your either or assumption has no basis in scientific thought.
You aren't paying attention, are you?
"It’s really just a small part of the scientific body of knowledge. And your either or assumption has no basis in scientific thought."
Evolution has nothing to do with scientific knowledge. Evolution is the philosophy of naturalism supported by the fallacy of affirming the consequent.
Neither does evolution have anything to do with scientific thought. It is a philosophical position, not a scientific one.
It's not just evolution/creationism, it's all the implications of "Young Earth Creationism". A 6000 (more or less) year old earth requires throwing out most of the science of geology, astronomy, physics, etc, etc.