Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
This is the inevitalbe result when conservatives say “the parties are just the same”

This is the inevitalbe result when “the parties are just the same”

More accurate. Why will there be no filibuster of Kagen? Why will not even one republican call for one, oh they will rattle their sabers, but in the end they will roll over with a whimper.

When has the leadership sanctioned a member for jumping ship? Unless you consider Boehnor publicly demanding an apology from a republican house member for apologizing for the treatment of a corporation. When has a RINO lost a committee assignment for jumping ship?

49 posted on 06/30/2010 11:09:08 AM PDT by itsahoot (92 I think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: itsahoot

Bush appoints Roberts and Alito.

Obama appoints Sotomayor and Kagan.

The partie are the same. Yeah. Right. Sure. Gotcha. No difference. Clones. Mirror image. Yeah. Sure. Right.


55 posted on 06/30/2010 12:53:02 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (California Bankruptcy in 4... 3... 2...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: itsahoot
Why will there be no filibuster of Kagen?

Because it won't stop her confirmation for the Supreme Court, and you know it. The Dem Socialists own the Senate and the Senate committes. Nothing can stop her confirmation. When you are the Senate majority, you can stop a nominee or two before you have to take what is shoved down your throat. Not so when you are the ball-less minorty with no power whatsoever.

So what if Kagan was blocked? Do you think the next nominee and the next would suddenly be orignal-intent Constitutionalists? No, they too would be hard communists. You let a radical communist get elected - you get hard communists for SCOTUS jurists. That is how that works.

Letting a radical communist like Obama select communist SCOTUS jurists is the result we are getting because "principled" conservatives could not hold their noses and vote for that idiot McLame. No matter how bad he would be, he would not have nominated hard communists to the Supreme Court, and you know it.

56 posted on 06/30/2010 12:59:20 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (California Bankruptcy in 4... 3... 2...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson