There is no "winning" in Afghanistan, either commit to staying there for the next 50-100 years and westernize them or don't bother wasting the lives and body parts.
Hussein is already committed to bugging out next July, so what is the point of one more American casualty?
We were on the verge of being able to walk out victorious just a couple of years ago when the rules of engagement were changed by certain new leadership.
“There is no “winning” in Afghanistan...”
“The Iraq war is lost...”
-Harry Reid, 2007
Hey, I’ll be in Rome (again) in about 3 weeks!
Steele is right. The idiot kept saying that Iraq was an unnecessary war but Afghanistan was the right war and he was going to fight and succeed there.
WRONG...there will be no success in Afghanistan and we need to bring our troops home.
Enough life lost on a lost cause.
I believe that is precisely why this has turned into obummer's WAR. We had the upper hand, we had the Al Qaeida and Taliban on the run, until obummer came along and turned it political as usual and the blame game started and the "good" war vs "Bad" war AND THEN he announced TIMETABLE for when the troops would come home!!!!!!
MORON STUPID IMBECILE FOOL.
IT IS OBUMMER'S WAR because HE MADE IT SO and we are loosing and our soldiers' morale is down and we look and act as loosers.
I UTTERLY LOATHE THE CHARLATAN OCCUPYING THE WHITE HOUSE RIGHT NOW, THE DAMN FOOL.
The problem is that no one knows what " 'winning' in Afghanistan" means.
BTW, Ron Paul is one of the few voices of rationality on this issue.