Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ad watchdog rules: Objectification of women is okay, but not the lack of a seatbelt
mUmBRELLA ^ | July 9, 2010 | unattributed

Posted on 07/09/2010 3:13:09 PM PDT by smokingfrog

The Brut ad features three men ogling a woman in a bikini before concluding with the message: “Brut Code #85 Spot & share”.

The video has been labelled as sexist by commentators.

One complaint to the Advertising Standardas Board said:

I am in the obvious target audience of men aged 18-30 and am still disgusted at the lack of decency shown by any of the characters in the commercial and the lack of consideration shown by the advertisers themselves. The suggestion that women desire to be and deserve nothing more than to be gawked at as they walk down the street is an insult to human dignity. I am also appalled that this advert that focuses so much on the woman’s sexuality (her breasts are deliberately focused on at one point)

Another said:

“The coded language of the ad is sexist and demeaning to women and potentially has a very serious under story of gang rape.”

In its response to the complaint, Brut manufacturer Pharmacare said:

“The young woman is portrayed in a positive light, as the friends are naturally and openly appreciating her goods looks, but do not threaten or intimidate her in any way, in fact they keep a respectful distance in honour, or in awe, of her beauty and out of respect for her.”

And it also said of the woman in the bikini: “She is aware of her physical attributes and wears clothing and acts accordingly.”

The Ad Standards Board ruled:

-- snip --

(Excerpt) Read more at mumbrella.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: censored; nanystate; spotandshare
Video at link.
1 posted on 07/09/2010 3:13:12 PM PDT by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Cue the complaints from posters here about men being portrayed as bumbling idiots on tv so “fair is fair” in 3...2...1...


2 posted on 07/09/2010 3:15:34 PM PDT by coop71 (Being a redhead means never having to say you're sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Nothing makes sense anymore. The crazies have taken over the country.

Pepsi and Dr. Pepper will probably be banned in San Fran as they hand out pot to kids. don’t doubt it.


3 posted on 07/09/2010 3:15:46 PM PDT by GeronL (Just say NO to TV, it rots your brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

I approve


4 posted on 07/09/2010 3:16:33 PM PDT by Pajama Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

If we can’t objectify women anymore, then, well, life just wouldn’t be worth living.


5 posted on 07/09/2010 3:20:47 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Objectification?

How long did it take for someone to come up with that?

6 posted on 07/09/2010 3:23:14 PM PDT by curmudgeonII (Vocatus atque non vocatus deus aderit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
I watched it 20 or 22 times and I can't find anything wrong with it.

Of course, I had the sound off

7 posted on 07/09/2010 3:27:08 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Obama. Chauncey Gardiner without the homburg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

That woman is just like what today’s “liberated women” want to be. Boobs with a zero responsibility hole. Big deal. It could just as well be a knot hole on a tree. Men are men and boys are boys. Women have made themselves to be that.

My apologies to any “ladies” present.


8 posted on 07/09/2010 3:27:36 PM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pajama Blogger

Approve what? The decision of the Advertising Standards Board.

Me thinks the seatbelt thing was just a cop-out.


9 posted on 07/09/2010 3:33:19 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( - Eccl. 10:18 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Close.

They are banning the sale of pets.


10 posted on 07/09/2010 3:33:57 PM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to...." ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
"(her breasts are deliberately focused on at one point)"

Gee, I hadn't noticed!

11 posted on 07/09/2010 3:34:05 PM PDT by Enterprise (As a disaster unfolds, a putz putts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1

Still though, pets must be kept on a leash.

12 posted on 07/09/2010 3:37:07 PM PDT by Enterprise (As a disaster unfolds, a putz putts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Well, on leash suffices before and after the barefoot,pregnant, and in the kitchen phase.


13 posted on 07/09/2010 3:44:20 PM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to...." ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

The only thing women hate more than being ogled at, is being ignored


14 posted on 07/09/2010 3:45:36 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ...In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

You couldn’t have said it better!


15 posted on 07/09/2010 3:51:33 PM PDT by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Anyone seen the latest string of Bud Light commercials?

Every man in them is a fool.


16 posted on 07/09/2010 5:22:48 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our Troops, and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

approve women in bikinis


17 posted on 07/25/2010 8:05:41 PM PDT by Pajama Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson