[RobRoy]

>>So long story short, I don’t know who appointed you the official Tea Party arbiter, but I’ll call it whatever the hell I want.<<

Good point. :)

My concern is an over-broad vision, causing the whole thing to implode of its own weight. I thought the focus on taxes and tax funded organizations would do a tremendous amount of good, while an “undefined but ‘Boston tea party’ like” movement would collapse due to lack of focus.

Part of my role in my job is sort of sales engineer. We have learned to limit our presentations to two to three takeaways or the students leave with a lot of good information, none of which sticks more than 24 hours.

But you’re right. I’m not the official arbiter.

[wku man]

I apologize for my overreaction. I like to look at the Tea Party, or TEA Party if you prefer, as millions of individuals united behind a common cause, but still being there for their own individual reasons. I guess that's the small "l" libertarian in me.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!