Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: swain_forkbeard

I believe that all of the paperwork involved is sworn so Perjury can be brought to bear on these people. Once this ‘father’ gets his kid back it’s time some States Attorney convenes a Grand Jury or two and bring some indictments.


5 posted on 07/12/2010 12:26:24 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

Sounds like a tough one to prosecute to me. When a mother says she doesn’t know who the father is, what does that mean anyway? It must mean that there are several candidates and thus no certainty. So, obviously, whenever a woman claims not to know who the father is, she can never mean that there is no father. She must always mean that she can’t be sure who the father is becasue she had multiple sex partners. How could you ever prove that she lied about that?


10 posted on 07/12/2010 12:35:13 PM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

He is not going to get the kid back, he has been convicted of child endangerment and the Ohio family court will rule that the now bonded daughter is better off with her family...

It’s sad because they stripped him of his rights without due process when that process would have led to his losing the kids two years ago...

There is nobody in this case who is remotely appealing as a human being, except the baby girl.


29 posted on 07/12/2010 1:01:33 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson