Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

Maybe you know the answer....It’s my understanding that though Obama dropped the civil case, it was Bush who did not move forward on a criminal case....any idea why?


2 posted on 07/13/2010 9:45:14 AM PDT by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kimberly GG

Bush not moving forward is a smokescreen.

The election was in early November 08 and Bush & Co. were out 10 weeks later.


7 posted on 07/13/2010 9:53:51 AM PDT by JBR34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG
It was under President Bush's administration that the charges were brought against King Samir Shabazz, Jackson, and the New Black Panther Party. It was under the Obama administration that the case was completely dropped.

I posted links to videos that explains exactly what happened.

To see those videos Click Here

There are 4 YouTube videos. 3 with Megan Kelly Fox News interviewing the man Adam who was involved in prosecuting the case and 1 video of King Samir Shabazz. Each video is about 10 min.

9 posted on 07/13/2010 10:01:01 AM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG
I am just reading about it now. (Cynthia Tucker) The Dems are all over this. Media matters is saying that the Bush administration reduced this to civil charges and compared it to not going after a Minute Man on "Similar charges".

http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2010/07/12/bush-doj-decided-new-black-panthers-no-major-case/

However, there is a piece (by mediate.com) that points out that in May of 2009 there was an injunction against Shabazz and claims there was a great deal of misreporting.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/new-black-panther-chief-malik-shabazz-on-king-samirs-kill-white-babies-comment/

So, the truth- a difficult thing to come by is elusive at this point. Why didn't Bush go after Shabazz? He was probably gun shy and wanted to hand it off to the next administration.

Why doesn't Holder go after Shabazz? My speculation only- Because of the political fallout in his own 'minority' support groups. That, and perhaps some blatant bigotry.

11 posted on 07/13/2010 10:04:45 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG

My understanding is that the Black Panthers were convicted at a trial in which they refised to show up. They were convicted in absentia.
Probably another attitude of’the white man doesn’t hold any law over me’.

The group was awaiting sentencing & during that time frame, Holder dropped the charges.

I don’t know how ‘charges can be dropped’ when there is already a conviction & in one part of the case- one guy convicted admitted to what they did.

This administration is running a ‘Justice Department” which is anything but.

They are creating chaos over everything.


18 posted on 07/13/2010 10:18:40 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG

Here is a good explanation as to why this ‘Bush’s fault’ meme is faulty:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2551048/posts


19 posted on 07/13/2010 10:25:59 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG
Ah. And after looking at J. Christian Adams' interview with Fox for a moment, the case (that was dropped) was brought in January of 2009.

Interesting that it was brought just as Bush is leaving, or Obama is coming in. LOL!

So, Bush, as a parting 'gift' to the DemocRATs either instructed his DOJ people to bring the case right then, or the DOJ folks brought it themselves as Obama came into office! Ha!

Talk about dirty tricks! Perhaps this was a 'time bomb' for the Obama administration, designed to attack their Justice Dept. Either way the Obamsky's lose. If they prosecute the case they're 'Uncle Toms', and if they don't their 'bigots'. J. Christian Adams doesn't resign when Bush leaves, no- he waits to see how the case develops, then resigns and goes public when the Obamskys drop the case. Now he is the 'brave patriot' going public, -oh and by the way he now works for Pajamas Media. I am going to wait for the book to come out. -Just around election time.

I need to buy more popcorn.

20 posted on 07/13/2010 10:29:14 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG

Bush is a pragmatist. Apparently there was no evidence that people were too afraid to cast their votes, and the two men did not commit battery. Voter intimidation cases are very hard to win; only three have been successfully prosecuted in 45 years. Timing and location were probably factors, as well; a majority black district and a self-identified black president-elect.


22 posted on 07/13/2010 10:58:48 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson