Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Glenn

3,500 nuclear weapons could still get the job done I think. Imagine the consequences of two major cities of your opponents getting destroyed. Lets say Moscow and St. Petersburg and Shanghai and Beijing. Drop a 300KT weapon in the center of each of them and those countries would be reeling for quite a long time.


35 posted on 07/13/2010 5:03:42 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Sawdring

assuming all are able to lauch. Many could be destroyed in a first strike, some fail to lauch (i.e. see challenger explosion. rockets are not 100%), and the enemy doesn’t develop an effective anti-missile defense. The idea behind thousands of kill vehicles is that some would get through. Reduce the number and you increase the risk someone might try something.


36 posted on 07/13/2010 5:16:53 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Hey, Barack "Hubris" Obama, $10 is all it would take, why spend millions to cover it up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Sawdring
3,500 nuclear weapons could still get the job done I think.

Heck, 350 operationally deployed would probably be more than enough.

37 posted on 07/13/2010 5:17:22 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Sawdring

The principles of MAD, counter force, counter value, etc still apply despite Freeper droolers. ;-)


81 posted on 07/14/2010 9:26:19 AM PDT by verity (Obama, the bullshit and rhetoric President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson