Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry
Having stopped the threat, not everybody has the makeup to then take the kill shot.

Ummm...if you've stopped the threat, there is no legal reason to take the kill shot.

25 posted on 07/16/2010 6:12:58 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Niteranger68
Ummm...if you've stopped the threat, there is no legal reason to take the kill shot.

If the perp is still armed there is still a threat. If I sat on the jury and the perp was still breathing I'd consider there to still be a threat.

27 posted on 07/16/2010 6:25:55 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Niteranger68
Ummm...if you've stopped the threat, there is no legal reason to take the kill shot.

You're right. Shoot to stop, not shoot to kill.

If I ever had to shoot someone, I'd hope they lived. I don't want the death of another human being on my mind for the rest of my life, even if they 100% deserved it.

By forcing me to kill them, they'll have taken something from me. I'd do it if necessary, but wouldn't like having to live with it.
30 posted on 07/16/2010 6:55:05 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (In last year's nests, there are no birds this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Niteranger68

Yes, but only a mind reader would be aware of your perceptions regarding the threat at that point.


36 posted on 07/16/2010 9:41:51 AM PDT by G Larry (Democrats: expediting the Destruction of America, before they lose power...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson