After all, what could be more destructive to higher education then a girl in a tuxedo. It's a lot worse then gang fights and illiteracy. Burn the witch! She wanted to wear a tuxedo to her Prom. Maybe she should have opted out of her senior year for a sex change operation...
The queers are destroying another institution, the high school prom. How many parents will simply keep their kids home? How many schools will decide to do away with the prom? All because queers want to “get in the face” of normal people.
I think it is high time to look into the legal high jinx between the homosexual community and the legal world.
Legal seems to be the only way the fools can do anything.
What I want to know is, what about the rights of all the girls who had gym class the same time as the lesbian? If I were any of those girls, I’d sue to have her removed because I sure the heck wouldn’t want her looking at me.
Not many are going to like this, but I don’t think a public school can legally justify barring gay couples from the prom. There isn’t a sufficient basis of harm to deny them from an activity that’s put on a public institution.
Schools can simply not have proms. Groups of kids and their parents can arrange private parties and invite whom they choose. Or schools can have proms, the gays and lesbians and transgendered and whatever other kind freaks can attend and gross each other out; everybody else can go to private parties. Yet another American cultural institution the homosexuals are well on their way to ruining.
Perverts keep pushing, we keep backing up.
Solution: a parents’ group, “Class of 2011 Prom Boosters” puts on the prom, officially independent of the school, and then dissolves, with someone who is judgment-proof nominally in charge. Who are the sleazy lawyers and the perverts going to sue? The next year, an entirely different group, perhaps “Class of 2012 Prom Boosters”, does the same. If they are going to be sleazy and underhanded, it’s appropriate for us to evade their predatory practices.
Prom should be a heterosexual-only event.
After all, everyone knows heterosexual teen couples NEVER do anything inappropriate at or after prom. And they always leave plenty of room for Jesus when they dance.
I’m not a fan of labeling any and all opposition to the homosexual political agenda “bigotry,” but refusing to let two kids of the same sex go to a party together IS discrimination. What’s next? Turning one member of a gay couple away at the door if the other one is there? Breaking up two straight friends going stag?
Schools should stick to teaching facts, not indoctrinating kids with ANY view about homosexuality, pro- or anti-.
placemark.
After all, what could be more destructive to higher education then a girl in a tuxedo. It's a lot worse then gang fights and illiteracy. Burn the witch!Another argument for home-schooling. Get your kids out of public schools.
How does this hurt other high schools? I don't get it.
See: Equal Protection Clause
The girls just wanted to go to their prom together. Banning them or telling them what they can’t wear was a very stupid move. What’s the first thing a teenager wants to do when something is forbidden to them? Go out and do it while shouting as loudly as they can get away with. The ‘homosexual agenda’ would have been furthered a lot less if the couple had been allowed to go without a fuss so maybe this is a ‘homophobic agenda’ designed to frighten people into believing they’re under attack from LGBT groups or anyone who lives a different lifestyle.
Maybe they should have let her wear the tux to the prom. The District would have saved $35k and this would have been old news before it was even news.