Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hayworth takes his best shot at McCain in new TV ad
The Hill ^ | 7.23.10 | Sean Miller

Posted on 07/23/2010 11:02:16 AM PDT by pissant

Arizona Senate candidate J.D. Hayworth (R) launched his most aggressive attack of the primary campaign against Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) Friday.

The former congressman released his second TV ad of the race, which accuses McCain of supporting an “amnesty bill” for undocumented U.S. residents.

The ad features footage of McCain and President Obama talking about the effort to get immigration reform through the Senate.

“I helped author with Senator Kennedy comprehensive immigration reform and fought for it twice,” McCain says in the footage. It then transitions to Obama saying, “I stood with Ted Kennedy and John McCain and took on this tough issue.”

With immigration overshadowing the primary race, this ad is probably Hayworth’s best shot at closing the gap with the incumbent senator. Early voting, however, starts on July 29, which doesn’t give it much time to sink in.

The ad went up statewide Friday; it’s airing on broadcast and cable. It was produced by the Strategy Group for Media.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: jdhayworth; pissanttrolling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-105 next last
GREAT Ad. Finally!
1 posted on 07/23/2010 11:02:20 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

Ya think JD was keeping his powder dry for a time like this?


2 posted on 07/23/2010 11:05:02 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Why did you tie Palin in with the amnesty?

She was quietly governing Alaska when that went down.


3 posted on 07/23/2010 11:05:28 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

When is the primary in Arizona?


4 posted on 07/23/2010 11:08:12 AM PDT by SWEETSUNNYSOUTH (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Because she was spouting the same nonsense during their campaign together. Still is


5 posted on 07/23/2010 11:08:18 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Why did you tie Palin in with the amnesty?

Because he’s pissant, he can’t help it. His soul goal in life is to destroy everyone who’s last name is not Hunter.


6 posted on 07/23/2010 11:09:01 AM PDT by Robbin (If Sarah isn’t welcome, I’m not welcome, it’s just that simple…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet; jesseam; unkus; flat; Clintonfatigued; freekitty; sheik yerbouty; 70th Division; ...

I have long advocated that Conservative Republicans climb in the RAT/RINO sewer and fight them using their words, their arrogance, and their deeds against them.

Nice guys come in last and We The People suffer the consequences.


7 posted on 07/23/2010 11:10:31 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Take back our country on November 2, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robbin

That’s it MENSA! That’s why I’m promoting at least 5 guys to run for president.


8 posted on 07/23/2010 11:11:34 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: digger48

John McCain—>Sarah Palin—>[...]—>Kevin Bacon


9 posted on 07/23/2010 11:14:02 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Orly Taitz is not a guy.


10 posted on 07/23/2010 11:15:03 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Unless the last name is Thatcher, slim chance I’d be pushing a chick for prez.


11 posted on 07/23/2010 11:17:04 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No need to be rational about it, right?


12 posted on 07/23/2010 11:18:53 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Since I don’t think they should even be able to vote, what makes you think I’d want one as CIC.


13 posted on 07/23/2010 11:20:02 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SWEETSUNNYSOUTH

We vote on August 24, 2010. This negative advertising is getting soooooo very old.


14 posted on 07/23/2010 11:21:41 AM PDT by ScoopAmma (We are led by the Resident -in Chief; aka part-time member of Webelo Troop 44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

They shouldn’t be allowed to leave the house without a male escort, either!


15 posted on 07/23/2010 11:22:21 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Yes, that’s what the Founders thought too, huh?


16 posted on 07/23/2010 11:23:40 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Robbin; pissant
Because he’s pissant, he can’t help it. His soul goal in life is to destroy everyone who’s last name is not Hunter.

LOL! And just like always, he starts calling people names. So predictable!

17 posted on 07/23/2010 11:26:40 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

Do you have that follow up on that FBI investigation of Hunter you were telling us about yet?


18 posted on 07/23/2010 11:29:01 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The Founders were smart enough to provide for amendment. What’s your excuse?


19 posted on 07/23/2010 11:29:05 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ScoopAmma

Funny. that was dead nuts on advertising. Only negative because Juan is an amnesty pimp.


20 posted on 07/23/2010 11:30:03 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ScoopAmma
This negative advertising is getting soooooo very old.

Just wait til this fall when the Congressional Democrat Desperation Campaign is in full-tilt slime mode

21 posted on 07/23/2010 11:30:47 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

How’d that prohibition thingee work out. Or the income tax. Hell, it wouldn’t surprise me to find out you were pimping for the ERA to pass into our constitution.


22 posted on 07/23/2010 11:33:51 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: pissant
Any other Amendments you find troublesome? Or simply all of them? That's what passes for your reasoning: the 18th Amendment was bad, therefore the xth Amendment is bad.
24 posted on 07/23/2010 11:38:24 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
John McCain—>Sarah Palin—>[...]—>Kevin Bacon

there really are no more than six degrees to Kevin Bacon here.. John McCain to Sarah Palin... Sarah Palin to Oprah Winfrey (the interview)... Oprah Winfrey to Whoopi Goldberg (The Color Purple)... Whoopi Goldberg to Demi Moore (Ghost) and Demi Moore to Kevin Bacon (A Few Good Men)... i'm sure there are other routes... maybe even shorter ones...

25 posted on 07/23/2010 11:43:31 AM PDT by latina4dubya ( self-proclaimed tequila snob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stormer


McCain addresses the racist La Raza


26 posted on 07/23/2010 11:44:49 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Only a moron would surmise I implied all were bad. It’s called examples - examples that show Amendments are NOT necessarily positive. But since you asked, the 16-19th, 23rd, and the 26th


27 posted on 07/23/2010 11:50:52 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Hey, just pointing out the failure in your logic: “The Founders are infallible, except when they are not.”


28 posted on 07/23/2010 11:53:22 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Who said they were infallible? Your logic was “if you don’t want women to vote you must be in favor of Sharia like laws”. A simple example of an enlightened people in an enlightened age showed your idiocy.


29 posted on 07/23/2010 11:56:04 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Yes, that’s what the Founders thought too, huh?

Actually no. Watch Glenn Beck and you may learn something. It may not soak in, but that is your responsibility. You could learn when women's right to vote was lost and why.

30 posted on 07/23/2010 11:57:11 AM PDT by itsahoot (Republican leadership got us here, only God can get us out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Glenn Beck’s take on history is shaky, to say the least.


31 posted on 07/23/2010 11:58:38 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Enlightened, huh? LOL

"Women shouldn't vote because the 18th Amendment was a mistake. Besides, the Founders didn't want the Constitution to be amended. Sometimes."

32 posted on 07/23/2010 12:01:21 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Oh, and can women vote under Sharia law? I’ve never bothered to check.


33 posted on 07/23/2010 12:04:26 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Your logic is non-existent.

Me: Repeal the 18th

You: You must want sharia

Me: Did the Founders practice sharia

You: They allowed amendments

Me: Not all amendments positive (with examples)

You: gibberish


34 posted on 07/23/2010 12:05:50 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I pointed out that the Founders allowed for the Constitution to be amended, after you cited to them as authority, and you've been wriggling on the pin ever since.

An a quick check indicates to me that Sharia law does not allow women to vote. Do you have any other opinions about how to make women second-class citizens? Should they be allowed to own property, for example? How about enter into contracts?

35 posted on 07/23/2010 12:10:01 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: pissant

When you tie your support for Hayworth to a hatred and dismissal of Palin, you alienate people you shouldn’t want to alienate.

Just a word of advice.


36 posted on 07/23/2010 12:11:29 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant; ExTexasRedhead; John Semmens; theothercheek; Hildy; Arizona Carolyn; machogirl; ...
Pretty good 30-second spot by the Hayworth people. I'd suggest they alternate that one with a couple of others on the same theme, perhaps one showing a couple of seconds of McCain's speech to La Raza with the La Raza banner in front of the podium (assuming that it wasn't in Spanish) and letting people know what La Raza represents.

McCain seems to be doing a huge flip-flop from supporting a form of amnesty a few years ago to being tough on illegal immigration now. Hayworth can't let him get away with it.

37 posted on 07/23/2010 12:17:28 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

What did the 19th amendment have to do with those subjects? Answer: Nothing.

What did my giving an example of a time before the 19A when America functioned just fine have to do with the validity of the amendment process to the constitution? Answer: Nothing.

And what does providing other examples of stupid amendments have to do with the Founders, as if they were some how responsible for future generations’ good or bad choices? Answer: Nothing


38 posted on 07/23/2010 12:17:44 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pissant

i”ll admit I am no longer a chick, but I am a pretty good hen. And I certainly vote FOR my country. Actually, I seriously think that where we went wrong was when we no longer required a voter to be a land owner.


39 posted on 07/23/2010 12:18:41 PM PDT by Paperdoll (REGISTER TO VOTE THEN DO IT RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: altura

When you tie your support or non-support of Hayworth based on anyone else’s opinion, whether mine or Palin’s, instead of figgering it out yourself, you should re-examine your life.


40 posted on 07/23/2010 12:19:19 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

Hey, there you go!


41 posted on 07/23/2010 12:20:03 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Absolutely. Not to mention his repulsive leftwing Reform Institute.


42 posted on 07/23/2010 12:21:59 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I wasn’t alive in 1920 (although you act as if you were), but I’m not too sure that “America functioned just fine” before then. That’s merely recognizing that the problems America faced during that period cannot be swept under a rug, especially by some proto-Neanderthal who doesn’t think that women should be allowed to vote.


43 posted on 07/23/2010 12:28:35 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You support the ERA too?


44 posted on 07/23/2010 12:31:59 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pissant

[pissant shakes his cane in the air]


45 posted on 07/23/2010 12:33:45 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I’ll take that as a yes. Thank God the wonderful Phyllis Schlafly led the fight to kill it.


46 posted on 07/23/2010 12:38:00 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Wrong again, old man.


47 posted on 07/23/2010 12:39:12 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
I only whis Hayworth had done this earlier. When he was only down by 7 points hitting hard looks like just bare knuckle politics. But now the polls are showing him way down and hitting hard smacks of desperation. This needed to be said and I'm glad JD said it, but I do wish he had done so a month ago.
The GOP has to have 41 non-RINO seats in the Senate after November if they want to keep Obama stopped. Keeping the RINOs from jumping ship will be a lot easier if they know that even if they switch sides they will just get filibustered anyway. At the moment there are 5 mega RINOs in the Senate, Grahm, Collins, Snowe, Brown and McCain. There is nothing we can do about the first four, they aren't up for election. We are likely to pick up six or seven seats in November, but one, Kirk from Illinois, is also a turbo RINO and can't be counted on. Removing McCain reduces the number of RINOs by one and may make all the difference come next January.
48 posted on 07/23/2010 12:43:00 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Oh, so you don’t support the ERA? Why you are an unelightened neanderthal not wanting women’s equality etched into the constitution. Hells bells, even such GOP luminaries as Howard Baker and Dick Nixon. It had a real shot at passing too. But Schlafly and a few neanderthals lobbied very successfully, to the point where even some states that initially passed it rescinded it.


49 posted on 07/23/2010 12:47:18 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pissant

That’s what funny about you: I remind you that the Founders allowed for constitutional amendments, and you think that makes me favor the ERA. Your brain is logic-free.


50 posted on 07/23/2010 12:49:26 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson