Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
Women didn’t have to walk behind the men, as you flippantly suggested I’d support, since I support repealing the 19A.
I'm simply asking how far you would go in order to return women to their second-class status.

And you tortured logic to somehow push the notion that because the 18A was bad, that I used that to argue that it being bad made the 19A bad.
"How’d that prohibition thingee work out[?] Or the income tax[?]"

Time for your nap, old man . . . you can't even remember what you typed a few hours ago.

62 posted on 07/23/2010 2:25:12 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy
"How’d that prohibition thingee work out? Or the income tax?"

Yep, 2 excellent examples of Amendments gone awry. Notice I didn't mention the first 10, or the 13th, or the 24th? The sole purpose of that statement was to give OTHER EXAMPLES of worthless amendments. There is no "if then therefore" relationship.

63 posted on 07/23/2010 2:52:24 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson