You are right. I sort of like Klayman, he files complaints that are true, and at least stands to be counted! Who does win a lot of these type of suits? like you say, these judges don’t want to be reminded to look in their own back yard!
Matter of fact is, Kagan is a baby murdering,anti constitution communist scumbag carpet muncher. and besides that, shes ugly....
The point of advise and consent is to weed out scum like she. That process has been hampered in the rail road time table to get her on the SC. Even light in the loafers Graham said she looked ok to him, sans this info.
The confirmation process must be put on hold till this is beat to death, period. Any sanction levied by the SC must be taken into consideration. This would be similar to having a previously disbarred attorney, Clinton, put on the court..there must be no taint in such an appointment...sorry it is a lifetime one, not one that has the benefit of a set time. As someone else said, no matter if another person is equal to her or more liberal, the fact they are not tainted is the bar, not whether or not she passes the political litmus test.