Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trod Upon

Nothing specifically says it cannot be a B-61 nuke. Still comfortable with that line of reasoning?

A serial number does not impact the gun’s ability to function. I can protect myself as well with a gun that has a serial number as one without. All the guns I carried in the military had serial numbers.


21 posted on 07/30/2010 10:07:43 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
And you have it backwards, anyway. What in the Constitution gives the Federal government the power to require serial numbers on firearms? Because without an enumerated power, it's up to the states, or people.

/johnny

24 posted on 07/30/2010 10:13:32 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

Actually I am comfortable with the line of reasoning. Try and buy a B-61 on the private market. Look, I agree that serial numbers are indeed innocuous in and of themselves, even valuable when dealing with situations like theft. The problem is the the logic used to require them can easily be extended to require other modifications/conditions that render a firearm unusable for all practical purposes even though it may still be technically functional. Make no mistake that this is one direction we will be heading after the Heller decision.


60 posted on 07/31/2010 4:32:40 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson