Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chickadee

That is interesting. Just because the case was dropped does not mean it didn’t happened, it just means that the DA is not interested in going forward. Sometimes that means that there is not enough evidence or in this case they are trying to protect AlGore.


17 posted on 07/31/2010 6:19:03 AM PDT by svcw (Real faith is always increased by opposition, false confidence is damaged & discouraged by it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: svcw
I will NOT defend Al Gore, but how could an investigation go forward with a "woman" who fails a polygraph, has no evidence (that she claims to have), gets paid for her story, and refuses to even release the medical records from the incident?

I can't stand Al Gore, and I would be the first one piling on if this story had any credence, but from everything released so far, this woman sounds as unbelievable as the Duke Lacrosse "victim". The DA's career, in that case was rightfully destroyed because he ran with a case that had no evidence, why should this case be any different?

18 posted on 07/31/2010 6:24:08 AM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: svcw

Oftentimes, it means the DA doesn’t think he can get a conviction. I read an article from an Oregon newspaper that said there was no dna evidence on the pants.

Let’s see what The Enquirer or the masseuse does next. The lengthy and thorough account of the encounter is what tended to give the accusation credibility.


19 posted on 07/31/2010 6:28:56 AM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson