Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ScottLA37

Gay rights activists say no, because the argument is that marriage only allows one man to marry one woman...this ruling would allow on man to marry one man. Unless marriage allowed one man to marry 20 people, gays couldn’t either.

Or so the argument goes.


306 posted on 08/04/2010 7:31:31 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: SideoutFred

When 2 people have the same rights as 1 person, how does this not relate to 3 or more? Not letting 3 people marry is a violation of their rights too, just the same as 2.


308 posted on 08/04/2010 7:36:56 PM PDT by ScottLA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson