Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Judge Make Right Call In Gay Marriage Case?
Fox News ^ | August 4, 2010 | steelers6

Posted on 08/04/2010 9:43:55 PM PDT by Steelers6

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
The judge should have recused himself. Ted Olson sells out the memory of his wife Barbara who died in 9-11.
1 posted on 08/04/2010 9:43:57 PM PDT by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

I am kinda surprised that a conservative website still garners 54 percent that says that prop 8 violates the constitution.


2 posted on 08/04/2010 9:46:44 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

That maggot Olson swerved way over to the left after Barbara died.


3 posted on 08/04/2010 9:48:02 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The United States of America! aka The Big Piñata. Bash it and the goodies fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

If Fox is conservative, civilization is doomed.


4 posted on 08/04/2010 9:48:41 PM PDT by Binstence (Live Freep or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Probably DUers got wind of the poll and swamped it.

Definitely in need of freeping.


5 posted on 08/04/2010 9:48:47 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I am kinda surprised that a conservative website still garners 54 percent that says that prop 8 violates the constitution.

a.) Fox News is not a conservative website.

b.) Homosexuals own the media--Fox included.
6 posted on 08/04/2010 9:49:54 PM PDT by Antoninus (It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
b.) Homosexuals own the media--Fox included.

After all, Shepardess Smith works there. He/she probably has supervoter and repeat voter privileges and has skewed the poll.

7 posted on 08/04/2010 9:53:26 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

Order in the courtroom – here come de judge! All ye mere mortals bow to his honor.


8 posted on 08/04/2010 9:53:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6
Tried to leave the following comment but I wouldn't sign up:

The trap is to agree to the underlying premise in the first place. Homosexuality is a behavior, not an identity. By failing to understand this, you build your argument on a falsehood to begin with. The examples of the recent court custody fights between states are a perfect illustration. In these fights one half of a lesbian couple leaves the lifestyle and gets married to men. They then don't want to share custody with the former female partner.

So how can it be an identity if you are “gay” on Monday and “straight” on Friday?

The core problem is that homosexuality is a disorder. It is an aberration of the normal. Sorry, facts are stubborn things. The judge in this case suffers from the disorder and should have recused himself from the case to begin with. Many gays become ex-gays over time and NARTH and other organizations can help.

This ruling should be overturned, but with the current lack of thinking among people, it is doubtful it will be. Regardless, the homosexuals who “marry” will not be married. Marriage is between a man and a woman. No one is denied that.

9 posted on 08/04/2010 10:01:56 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6
"The judge should have recused himself. Ted Olson sells out the memory of his wife Barbara who died in 9-11."

I just happened to see Ted Olson on the news but didn't get what he had to do with this case. Can you fill me in?

10 posted on 08/04/2010 10:03:36 PM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

As in the days of Noah . . .


11 posted on 08/04/2010 10:12:30 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever ( Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

Since the judge is gay if he decided that proposition was invalid he’s a hero in the gay community and the liberal areas in San Fransisco and Los Angeles. If on the other hand he decided it wasn’t he’d be a traitor to the gay community in lots of their eyes and would be ostracized/shunned. If there is any dirt on him or any significant others in his life or his family they would see it got out (they’d have gone after his family no matter what if he was straight). His life would be made a living hell.

Does anyone know if he has a significant other and they want to get married?


12 posted on 08/04/2010 10:13:58 PM PDT by airedale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

The slippery slope has turned into a log ride. What’s coming promises to be intensely unpleasant. The left has sought to dismantle the foundation of society and it looks as though they may have finally succeeded.

>> Insert part about inheriting the wind here <<<


13 posted on 08/04/2010 10:14:14 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I am kinda surprised that a conservative website still garners 54 percent that says that prop 8 violates the constitution
Trolls. Lots of people that are infected with virulent hatred for Fox News, what with the left-wing propaganda against it.
14 posted on 08/04/2010 10:14:49 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
"The left has sought to dismantle the foundation of society and it looks as though they may have finally succeeded"

I've long thought that the institutionalization of homosexual marriage would be a trigger event. Two more rulings and that trigger event could be at hand.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

15 posted on 08/04/2010 10:20:39 PM PDT by wku man (Steel yourselves, patriots, and be ready. Won't be long now....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

Question:
Is the regulation of marriage law a state enterprise, or a federal enterprise?

I thought it was a state enterprise. If so, then this judge is totally out of his mind! (to be kind)


16 posted on 08/04/2010 10:24:37 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

He should have recused himself because he is gay.
He should NOT have ruled on this.


17 posted on 08/04/2010 10:27:01 PM PDT by cruise_missile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

Only one Judge can define marriage and He isn’t from California


18 posted on 08/04/2010 10:33:25 PM PDT by uscga77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6
I don't see how anyone can now make a legal argument against polygamy. You can't appeal to a traditional interpretation of marriage because that argument is now legally invalid. It will be interesting to see how these same people will defend a limitation of two people, which logically is untenable now.
19 posted on 08/04/2010 10:48:58 PM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelers6

Hell no. There is a reason there are men and women.


20 posted on 08/04/2010 11:03:10 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson