OK. Kovacs writes "A simple search of the high court's own website reveals Kagan's name coming up at least nine times on dockets involving Obama eligibility issues." He links to this page as support for that claim.
Out of those "nine times" Kovacs cites, it appears that precisely ZERO of them actually involve Obama eligibility issues, as Kovacs claims.
Louis Lutz is a fruitcake who sued Bush for $100 billion, and then appealed his way up to the Supreme Court.
Jerome Julius Brown and Gary William Holt are prisoners, and their cases appear to be civil rights claims.
The Real Truth About Obama, Inc., Petitioner v. Federal Election Commission was an FEC case about anti-Obama ads about abortion.
And Abdul Hamid Abdul Salam Al-Ghizzawi and Jamal Kiyemba were Guantanamo detainees who filed suit over their detention.
Nothing about Obama's eligibility in a single one of them. Notice how Kovacs doesn't actually quote anything from any of the cases that shows they're eligibility-related; he just says they are. This is a good illustration of how much trust you should put in WND's reporting.