We have a Supreme Court nominee who is implicated in helping to prevent disclosure of information pertaining to a President’s eligibility for office, nominated by that President himself. Does this not strike you as a quid pro quo? Dangerous at all?
Apparently not, all you can do is pop on the thread and condemn anyone who has a problem with it by using a leftist term of derision.
Strange. I take it you approve of Kagan.
No, a vote for Kagan is a vote against the Second Amendment. That's reason enough and I don't see how a bunch of obscure cases makes a difference when I can't find any info on the plaintiff.
You didn’t notice the “/s”?.......................