Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitch Daniels: We need a “truce” on social issues (Daniels: SoCons are a Distraction)
Hot Air ^ | June 10, 2010 | Allahpundit

Posted on 08/10/2010 2:28:39 PM PDT by GOPGuide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
National Review has been talking up RINO Mitch Daniels just like they were talking up McCain.

Watch out for Daniels because the establishment is looking to him to save the Rockefeller wing Republicans if/when Myth Romney flames out.

1 posted on 08/10/2010 2:28:43 PM PDT by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Social issues are a matter of character and are most definitely not off the table.


2 posted on 08/10/2010 2:31:34 PM PDT by upsdriver (ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Not to mention he’s bald and about 5 foot 5.

Goodbye!


3 posted on 08/10/2010 2:32:42 PM PDT by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Dead is an understatement.


4 posted on 08/10/2010 2:32:58 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

They want to deflect and dilute the Tea Party movement just as much as the left does.


5 posted on 08/10/2010 2:35:11 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

I think Romney is already done. He will have a big problem shaking that whole Romneycare thingy.


6 posted on 08/10/2010 2:35:37 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

Right.

Daniels is the Rockefeller-Bush-Gerald Ford wing’s backup RINO.


7 posted on 08/10/2010 2:36:35 PM PDT by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
(Daniels: SoCons are a Distraction)

Why bother? Over half the SoCons vote Democrat anyway.

8 posted on 08/10/2010 2:37:02 PM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

A nation’s greatness and soundness are directly tied to its goodness in the sight of God.


9 posted on 08/10/2010 2:38:08 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Daniels still denying a Congressional district in the state a special election?


10 posted on 08/10/2010 2:39:07 PM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
I heard the same tripe over last weekend from a "GOP" legislative candidate. "I'm not taking a position on social issues," he said, "only the financial ones." Then one of his handlers stepped in and added, "Until the financial issues are taken care, of we aren't getting into these other issues." (such as homosexual marriage, "gay rights," abortion, etc., etc.

These RINO's think that taxes and deficits are the only issues that compel voters to support them. NOT!

11 posted on 08/10/2010 2:39:30 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Yeah, this guy is a mealy-mouthed weasel. No thanks. We have had enough of those.

How can someone say they are pro-life but then see it as a secondary issue? People who are pro-life believe they are fighting murder. How can murder be set aside? People who believe that a fetus is not a baby are ridiculous, but they are not nearly as creepy as those who claim to be pro-life but say it would not affect how they vote or govern. “Yeah, I know it’s infanticide, but we shouldn’t make a big deal out of it.”


12 posted on 08/10/2010 2:39:33 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20; GOPGuide

Whom should the republican presidential nominee be, in 2012? I think that Mike Huckabee, Dirk Kempthorne, and Haley Barbour will run.


13 posted on 08/10/2010 2:39:58 PM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

At least he wouldnt be nominating Harriet Meiers to the Supreme Court.


14 posted on 08/10/2010 2:43:03 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins

Who the heck is Dirk Kempthorne?


15 posted on 08/10/2010 2:44:09 PM PDT by Politicalmom (A racist is a conservative who is winning an argument with a liberal.-FReeper Freespirited)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Exactly what conservative social issue is on the advance? Seems like people are just trying to sandbag the levies at the moment. Homosexual marriage is a CHANGE to 4000 years of history. Trying to hold onto what’s left isn’t exactly in your face aggression.


16 posted on 08/10/2010 2:45:14 PM PDT by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

No Daniels will probably put another Souter or John Paul Stevens on the Court, one of those justices who won’t get “distracted” by social issues.


17 posted on 08/10/2010 2:45:19 PM PDT by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
Daniels is correct. Social issues be damned for now. We have bigger fish to fry...like saving the country from fiscal ruin.

Its going to take some big ones to put the wheels back on the USA and getting stuck on the social issues will NOT do it this time around.

What good is character if you have no country left?

I don't know if Daniels is the guy. Does not really matter.

Unless we FIX the financial problems we have nothing.

If you are a “social issues” voter, you better learn what really matters for the here and now.

Hint:

It's not abortion or same sex marriage.

18 posted on 08/10/2010 2:47:14 PM PDT by photoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

I think he would make a great budget director or some such in the Sarah Palin administration....


19 posted on 08/10/2010 2:48:12 PM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins

Whoever wins. I have no clue at this point who that may be. I liked Fred Thompson last time out, that shows how much I know.


20 posted on 08/10/2010 2:49:10 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson