When I write a vile post about Midwesterners like you did about working class and poor Southerners then you can look into that possibility.
Grow up and lay off the childish posts.
Ah, but the problem is, I never once mentioned "Southerners" or "working class" in my original comment. I made no sectional reference whatsoever, and my comment - if you would bother to stop having a hissy fit for a minute and actually *think* about it - was most definitely not about "working class" people, since working class people don't, among other things, sit around collecting a welfare check and watching Jerry Springer (they "work," which is why they're called "working class").
These are things YOU *assumed* about my post, and the fact that in making the assumption, you identified Southerners and working-class people, shows that it is YOU, not me, who implicitly associates these groups with being welfare-consuming trailer trash.
In fact, the only example I gave of the type of person I was talking about was Levi Johnson - who is definitely not working class (since he appears to not be into "working" eh?), and who lives about as far from the South as it is possible to be and still inhabit territory of the United States of America.
Sorry, but YOU'RE the one with anti-Southern, anti-working class prejudices, since you're the one who assumes these groups to be welfare monarchs.
Like I said, stop being a hater.
Grow up and lay off the childish posts.
Childish? What's childish about pointing out that your logic is flawed, and your implicit premises are prejudicial?