Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: Australian Federal Election Count as it happens
21st August 2010

Posted on 08/21/2010 12:49:31 AM PDT by naturalman1975

This is a live thread to follow the count for the Australian Federal Election 2010. Polling stations in the eastern Australian states (which means the large bulk of Australia's population) close at 6pm Australian standard time - that is 1am in California, and 4pm in New York for American comparisons.

Australia currently has a Labor government elected in November 2007 under Prime Minister Kevin Rudd who defeated the Liberal/National coalition government of Prime Minister John Howard which had governed Australia for approximately 11 years. Labor, in response to poor opinion poll results, recently replaced their leader, giving us our first female Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, while the Liberal party (senior party in the coalition) after trying a very moderate party member as Leader of the Opposition, chose conservative Tony Abott as its leader in December last year.

In simple terms, this is an election of socialist Labor versus the conservative Liberal/National coalition, and the end result will be either Julia Gillard continuing as Prime Minister, or being replaced by Tony Abott.

But it isn't quite that straightforward.

Australia's political system is largely based on that of the United Kingdom, with some element adopted from the system of the United States. We have a Parliament with two Houses - a House of Representatives and a Senate - that are roughly similar to the US Congress, with the House of Representatives consisting of Members elected to represent local constituencies roughly based on equal population, while the Senate has an equal number of Senators representing each state (two 'Territories' of Australia also have a smaller number of Senators). What matters today is the election of the House of Representatives - the Senate is important, but it doesn't determine who holds government and the complicated voting system used there means we won't know its make up for some time.

So let's look at the House of Representatives.

There are 150 seats in the House of Representatives. If a party (or coalition of parties) wins 76 seats, it wins government. If no party (or coalition) achieves that number we have a hung Parliament - which could happen, and if it does, both Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott will need to see if they can make a deal to form government (Gillard, as the incumbent, is entitled to the first chance to do so).

There are four parties of relevance to the House (there are a lot more parties, but only four are statistically likely to win even a single seat in the House).

We have Labor - who currently hold 83 seats and the government. A socialist party with all that entails. I am afraid I think they are most likely to be narrowly returned - but I'm willing to be wrong. The bottom line is we don't want Labor winning 76 seats, and even if they win 71 or so, they have a reasonable chance of forming a minority government.

We have two conservative parties - the Liberal Party and the National Party. These two parties nearly always operate in coalition and differences between them are minor. The Liberals are the larger party in the coalition and tend to represent conservatives in cities and the suburbs. The Nationals tend to represent conservatives in rural areas. There is also the Liberal-National Party (or LNP) which reflects the fact that in the state of Queensland and the Northern Territory, the two parties have formally combined. For the purposes of tonight, these three parties can all be counted together - so if they can win, combined, a minimum of 76 seats, we win. We go into this election with 63 seats. With 72, we have a chance to form a minority government, assuming Labor hasn't managed 76 - how good a chance is very hard to say.

The other party of relevance is the Greens. The Greens have never won a seat in the House of Representatives, but have a reasonable chance of doing so today - one single seat which is currently held by Labor. The Greens have made it clear that in the event of a hung Parliament, they would give their support to Labor.

There are also four independents - they will, if reelected, or if any other independents are elected, have the balance of power in a hung parliament. All four of them are former members of the conservative parties (one Liberal and three Nationals) so if this happens, it may come down to whether their conservative tendencies are more or less important to them, than the reasons they left their parties.

So 76 seats is the magic number - it may help Americans to consider this as equivalent to Electoral College votes in your presidential elections (although they come in one at a time, not in blocks).

Now - Australia is a federation of six states (former British colonies) and two major territories (there are a number of minor territories, but they don't return Members of Parliament and are irrelevant here).

Polling indicates that in the current election, conservatives (the Liberals, Nationals, and Liberal Nationals) are most popular in Queensland, New South Wales, and Western Australia. Labor is most popular in Victoria and South Australia. In simple terms, to win, conservatives are hoping we can win enough seats in Queensland and New South Wales, and Labor is hoping they can win seats in Victoria and South Australia to hold us off. We're certainly interested in the other states and territories - we'll take a win anywhere we can get one, and a loss anywhere can hurt us - but most focus will be on these four states.

One final note - Australia has a preferential voting system - you have to rank candidates in the order you want them, not just vote for a single candidate. That means as results come in, the initial count (the 'primary vote') doesn't always matter much - unless a candidate does win 50% of it. What counts is how the votes go after the 'Distribution of Preferences', what is referred to as the 'Two Party Preferred' or '2PP' vote. Win 50%+1 of that, and you are in.

As happens in the US, media outlets use statistical analysis to try and call seats well before counting is complete. They are generally pretty good at it. We often start to get some calls within 30 minutes of polls closing.

OK... time to start the live thread.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: australia; election2010; juliagillard; tonyabbott
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-249 last
To: naturalman1975

Thanks for the live thread and congratulations on the outcome! We’ll be pulling for a change in government soon.


241 posted on 08/21/2010 7:28:52 AM PDT by TonyInOhio ( Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I wasn’t happy for Ozzies stuck with KRudd, either. I found it rather spooky that he did the same unicorn speeches similar to the Won. Long on skittles, short on substance.


242 posted on 08/21/2010 11:04:35 AM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Tentative congratulations, Naturalman1975. At least labor does not have a majority. Whew.

Please keep us posted. And may the force be with us Stateside in November!


243 posted on 08/21/2010 11:10:24 AM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Any update? CNBC is reporting that Labor has agreed to all of the demands of the independents and the conservative coalition has not.


244 posted on 08/26/2010 2:55:57 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

The conservative coalition now looks to have 73 near certain seats, Labor has 71. The Greens have 1, and there are 4 independents.

1 seat remains in doubt, but is most likely going to go Labor over Liberal.

Negotiations are underway with the independents at present.

What Labor has agreed to and the coalition has not is a demand by the independents that they have access to confidential Treasury information concerning the state of the budget. The Prime Minister has agreed, the Leader of the Opposition has not - the reason he has not, is because the request is probably a violation of what are called the ‘caretaker conventions’ - the rules by which government is meant to operate in an election period (which we are still in). The request is arguably unconstitutional. This information is only supposed to be provided to a new government after it takes office.


245 posted on 08/26/2010 3:48:27 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Thanks; in the US an unconstitutional action to win an election by the Democrats would be expected. Maybe the Australian Labor party has the same mindset?


246 posted on 08/26/2010 3:52:40 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Yes, I think Ms Gillard is willing to ignore the rules if it gives her an edge.

This isn’t an incredibly blatant violation - if it went to the High Court, they might even rule that the exceptional circumstances justify it (it could be argued that the independents will certainly be part of any government and so are entitled to see this advice). But it’s certainly not something that should be done without careful thought and discussion.


247 posted on 08/26/2010 4:00:03 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
Hmmm. The way you describe it, it could be a tactical error by the conservatives and Labor could form a razor thin majority if all or most of the independents go with the Labor coalition.
248 posted on 08/26/2010 5:38:20 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Potentially possible, but I would say the odds are in our favour at this point.

The fact we have more seats than Labor (either 73-72, or 74-71 depending on the way the last seat falls - the numbers aren’t guaranteed but they are pretty solid at this point except in that last seat) is fairly important. And polls being taking in the independents own constituencies show most of the people who voted for them want them to support the coalition over Labor (by about 55-33, with 12% uncommitted). If they support Labor, it will hurt them in their own seats.

There’s no guarantees, but we’re in a better position than Labor right now.

If Labor could have got it up to 72 all, things would be different. In a tie, the incumbents have the greater right to govern and you have to find a justification to go different. If we’re ahead, we have the greater right, and they have find reasons to go Labor.


249 posted on 08/26/2010 5:46:10 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-249 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson