Reality is not defined by a court of law, especially when the court system is overrun by corruption (meaning liberals and rinos).
Your approach would define corruption as established by a court ruling, after some political hack prosecutor has been able to force his own corruption on the people via a sympathetic judge. Way to go rinos and liberals, you slimy piles of garbage.
Why let yourself be motivated by lies and corruption? Why let yourself be fooled?
“what court of law brought charges against her?”
Is that the standard? Whether she has been indicted That is a pretty low bar.
You asked for ethical charges and I gave them to you. Her post hoc filings, amending her tax returns and disclosure statements, are an acknowledgment that the charges were meritorious.
You seem to be carrying water for her. Why don’t you admit the obvious?