[1rudeboy]

Those dollars that return are nullified by dollars that wouldn’t have to. You are certainly creative in a certain dishonest ignorant sort of way.

Thanks, and you are remarkably retarded, but in an ignorant sort of way. Explain this concept of "nullification." Did it just pop into your head? I've never come across it in my studies of capital flows and formation.

I pinged some people, because your explanation will amuse them also.

[DoughtyOne]

You addressed the benefit of dollars that return to our nation. What you didn’t address is that dollars wouldn’t need to return if they had remained her initially.

The claimed benefit was nullified.

You called in others. You’re a real tiger aren’t you. This is the second time you’ve done so in our short exchange here, that I know of, that is.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Those dollars that return are nullified by dollars that wouldn’t have to.

It's obvious, we should grow coffee and bananas in Chicago, because we'd keep the benefit of our spending in Chicago and we'd still have all the products we use.

Of course the products would be of lower quality and several times the price, but it's worth it, to "nullify" those exported dollars.

What a moronic "argument". I'm embarrassed for him.