Well, that makes this article a double gem since it gives you a chance to dispel a widely held misconception or deception. You're welcome.
whatever
Geez, did you even read the article you posted ? Look at the comments. The author owned up to “standing corrected”, and then she went on with further semantic double speak with waffle words like “seems”, and other BS.
Call it a potential harbinger if you will, fine.
But it ain’t true.