Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SideoutFred

Castle would have lost to Coons. Why? Because he would have been the big spending incumbent in that race. Now Coons is the big spending insider. And he’s already making the mistake of going all negative and forgetting to give people a reason to vote for him, just like Castle. The elites of both parties really don’t seem to learn from each election. They just think that they didn’t do enough of what failed before.

Coons also lacks charisma. And like Castle, he’s been facing cakewalks in his prior elections.


260 posted on 09/14/2010 8:58:56 PM PDT by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]


To: LenS

Castle would have lost to Coons? EVERY poll has him trouncing Coons, including Rasmussen who had him double digits ahead.

Coons, on the other hand, has an 11 point lead over O’Donnell per Rasmussen just 5 days ago.

I don’t like Castle, can’t stand him...but I like him a helluva a lot better than Coons. O’Donnell will get slaughtered and we’ve just helped another liberal win a seat.

And some here call that victory. Wow.


261 posted on 09/14/2010 9:01:14 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson