[1rudeboy]

Me? Want you banned? That would be silly. I want you to stay and illustrate the economic fallacy that a benevolent government, through its actions, can "save" jobs (and "save" money doing so). Is there anything the government cannot do?

And I'm under no obligation to shift the conversation to the topic you want, when you won't even acknowledge the Law of Unintended Consequences. The fact that you cannot even comprehend it in the scope of a discussion about government intervention into the market indicates that you probably drifted onto the wrong website.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

I want you to stay and illustrate the economic fallacy that a benevolent government, through its actions, can "save" jobs

Where did I make the claim that our benevolent government can save our jobs. Quite the opposite, I agreed with you that their interference is making things worse.

And I'm under no obligation to shift the conversation to the topic you want, when you won't even acknowledge the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Shipping our technology to other countries has EVERYTHING do with unintended consequences, as do laying off the American consumers you're counting on to buy your cheaper products and borrowing money from foreign countries to pay their unemployment benefits.

And you're right, you have no obligation to answer my question. Just remember that I'm not the only one reading your failure to reply to it.