Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration
First off, I wasn't talking about whether she was qualified to run against Biden. I was talking about whether she is qualified to be the Republican VP nominee for 2012, which some other people on this thread have laughably suggested.

But since you asked.... She was qualified to run against Biden, but now she isn't?

All of these things were known 6 years ago, but because she knocked off the RINO darling, Castle, and might actually win the seat, the Establishment have gone after her with both guns.


First off, she didn't run for anything 6 years ago. I guess you're referring to two years ago, when she was trounced by Biden 65-35. Not coincidentally, she seems to be polling at about 35% now.

O'Donnell is light years better than Coon, that is the ONLY choice in this race.

Maybe, but Coons is going to win. The only choices in this race were Castle or Coons. Now, you might think we're better off with Coons in there than Castle, and you'd probably be right. But pretending that O'Donnell is going to somehow going to win in November is just plain unrealistic.

And pretending that she is VP material is just plain retarded.
391 posted on 09/18/2010 7:08:16 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: The Pack Knight
First off, she didn't run for anything 6 years ago. I guess you're referring to two years ago, when she was trounced by Biden 65-35. Not coincidentally, she seems to be polling at about 35% now.

The fact is she was the GOP nominee TWO years ago and no one thought she was 'crazy'.

And I believe 35% was the highest a Republican vote total anyone had received against him.

So, the point was (which you seemed to miss) was that she was the GOP nominee against Biden, but NOW is not qualified to be one.

Did something happen in the last two years?

The stuff she is being smeared with happened years ago, not two years ago.

[ O'Donnell is light years better than Coon, that is the ONLY choice in this race.]

Maybe, but Coons is going to win. The only choices in this race were Castle or Coons. Now, you might think we're better off with Coons in there than Castle, and you'd probably be right. But pretending that O'Donnell is going to somehow going to win in November is just plain unrealistic.

Maybe she is better than Coons, an avowed Marxist?

I do think we are better of having the CHOICE between O'Donnell and Coons rather than the phony choice between Castle and Coons.

And O'Donnell has a very good chance to win against Coons in this pro-GOP year.

No one gave Scott a chance either.

Now, the issue about her being vice president is a bit premature, but the fact is she would still be light years better than Biden.

408 posted on 09/18/2010 8:33:04 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson