[Clintonfatigued]

It sounds good on paper, but it’s probably unfeasible.

[Pollster1]

It sounds good on paper, but it’s probably unfeasible.

Why is "unfeasible" relevant? California has passed hundreds of unfeasible mandates over the past three decades. Other than driving business and private jobs out of the state, producing absurd housing prices followed by the bottom falling out of the market and runaway unemployment, and producing a massive deficit that they cannot fix, what harm has it done so far?

[richardtavor]

No probably about it..if they used 100% of your tax dollars, the best they could do is to increase their contribution by 3%...

[Cheerio]

It sounds good on paper, but it’s probably unfeasible.

Even if the politicos can force it to be feasible, it certainly won't be AFFORDABLE.

Nothing will replace oil, natural gas, and nukes in the foreseeable future. Fusion someday maybe.

Scientists have been working on controlling nuclear fusion for a long time, trying to make a fusion reactor to produce electricity. But they have been having trouble learning how to control the reaction in a contained space.
What's better about nuclear fusion is that it creates less radioactive material than fission, and its supply of fuel can last longer than the sun.

[colonialhk]

Double total cost and it all works out...morons

[Always Independent]

How will they develop geothermal energy if they won’t let them drill anywhere.