Posted on 10/03/2010 7:03:26 AM PDT by Huber
Look, if I was wrong about you being an Official Party Chairman for a different party, then just say so, but quit avoiding the question.
Hey man, if you think it’s just peachy to raise money for the Republican Senatorial Committee, or the RNC, so they can spend it on candidates like Mark Kirk, Lisa Murkowski, Charlie Crist, et al, that’s your problem.
I wasn’t even aware that Murkowski and Crist were still GOP candidates, but if that is your claim as the leader of a competing party, I guess it is true.
I said “candidates like.” Reading comprehension problems?
They spent millions of donors’ dollars on candidates “like” that in this election cycle. Recent enough for you?
In our party we tell people to donate to conservative candidates. Even Republicans, if they’re actually conservative.
Do you have some sort of problem with that?
You just named three people that are not GOP candidates, you need to update your argument.
It makes up my homepage on FR, as you well know. One click away. How much more open can one be without posting about it in every post, Mr. Hall Monitor?
You say that like you think that people are looking at each other’s homepage every time they read a post, that is nonsense, just be open about what you do, especially when someone asks you on a thread, it took forever to get you to come out on this thread.
I’m much more open about who and what I am then you are. Shoot, I have my real name on my homepage, and explicitly lay out my political associations. How ‘bout you?
You are a party hack, I am not, you are an actual, Official Party Chairman, yet it still is like pulling teeth to get you to admit it when it comes up on a thread where you are performing party duties behind a facade.
LOL...you don’t even list which state you’re from.
Are you going to investigate a freeper now, because he asked you if you were still the Official Chairman of a political party on a thread where you were attacking the top conservative in America and her party activities, and it turns out that he was right?
I’m not “investigating” anyone. I’m just laughing at your obvious hypocrisy.
So, you think Sarah Palin is above reproach when she raises money from conservatives that we know for a fact will end up going to fight conservatives and elect liberals?
Why?
One other question comes to mind:
How can you call someone who raises money for liberals “the top conservative in America”?
Especially when that person is pro-choice for states on abortion, believes that the courts are supreme and that judges get the last word on everything, is squishy on illegal immigration, having advocated for the McCain “pathway to citizenship” position, is willing to give the UN taxing authority and control over a majority of the planet’s surface through the Law of the Sea Treaty, etc.
How juvenile.
You might want to take a look at the subject of the thread.
Do you support fundraising for the NRSCC, especially under false pretenses on the back of the Tea Parties?
I guess like the rest of America, I can recognize who the leading conservative in America is.
Your party’s candidate will not do well in 2012, but we know he will be there nonetheless.
As usual, you refuse to deal with the actual conservative principles that are involved. Typical Republican.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.