To: montag813
Right. Illegal order. He should have refused to obey. Since he did NOT refuse to obey, he should be prosecuted for destroying evidence, and the non-com for conspiracy to destroy evidence.
41 posted on
10/15/2010 10:09:32 AM PDT by
ichabod1
(Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
To: ichabod1
“Since he did NOT refuse to obey, he should be prosecuted for destroying evidence,”
You’re an idiot.
44 posted on
10/15/2010 10:15:03 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson